Video index
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Calerdine called the meeting to order at 1:35 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 7 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The Agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 6:00 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2017.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The Agenda was accepted, as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Calerdine opened the public comments portion of the meeting:
MC ARVIE CRAWFORD, requested consideration of conducting a traffic study for Indian Canyon Avenue and traffic sign light at Rosa Park vicinity given the developments recently approve that will increase traffic.
JAAK JUHKENTALL, Sundial HOA, stated that the Board of Directors voted in support of the Vibe development; noting that it's a much better commercial design.
There being no further comments Public Comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Commissioner Donenfeld noted his recusal on the minutes due to his absence.
Commissioner Middleton requested a correction on regular meeting minutes, as noted.
Commissioner Hirschbein noted his abstention on the minutes due to his absence.
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 11, 2017 STUDY SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Motion to approve Approve minutes of the January 11, 2017 Study Session and Regular Meeting Minutes, as amended. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve minutes of the January 11, 2017 Study Session and Regular Meeting Minutes, as amended. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Item 2 was moved to the end of the Agenda.
2B. SUNLIGHT PEAK LLC. (DBA: "EPIC HOTEL"), FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CASE 5.1404 CUP) TO ALLOW AN EIGHT (8) UNIT BOUTIQUE HOTEL TO CONTAIN KITCHENS LOCATED AT 275 EAST TAMARISK ROAD, ZONE R-3 (GM). (CASE 5.1404 CUP)
Associate Planner Mlaker provided an overview of the proposed hotel as outlined in the staff report.
Technical Questions:
Vice-Chair Weremiuk:
-Removal of housing units (vacation rentals and condominium conversion) and tenant protection.
-Recent policy from the City Council regarding the preservation of apartment units.
-Noticing requirements for residents.
-Is State relocation available for low-income residents?
-Accessibility requirements for this project.
Commissioner Hirschbein:
-What is the intent of limiting the number of kitchens? Is there an advantage?
Commissioner Middleton:
-Has this been used building used as apartments all this time?
-City Council's right to call items forward.
Commissioner Donenfeld:
-Fire codes.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk:
-Requested condominium conversion ordinance.
Chair Calerdine opened the public hearing:
JIM CIOFFIC, project architect, addressed ADA accessibility of the units. Mr. Cioffi clarified that the apartment house is delapidated (at least of the units are inhabitable) that had issues with drug activity. He clarified the use as a boutique hotel not a condominium conversion.
There being no further speakers the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Middleton said the project is very impressive and verified the number of units are inhabitable, changes made to units by tenants, and notification of conversion for tenants.
She noted concern about housing rental stock and strongly believes tenants should receive notice of conversion.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk thinks the project is beautiful; however, she expressed concern about loss of rental housing and would like City Council to review this project. She made a motion to approve with changes.
Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code.
Commissioner Hirschbein spoke in support of the motion but has a concern about removing affordable rental housing stock from the city.
Motion to approve Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Chair Calerdine.
Vote to approve Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. (Approved)
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
3A. ARMADA REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION, AND A FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR "VIBE", A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 93 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND 72 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON SMALL LOTS ON A 24-ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH FARRELL DRIVE AND EAST BARISTO ROAD, ZONE PD 232 (CASE 5.1046 PDD 232 AMND, 3.3974 MAJ, TTM 36689 AND TPM 36767). (KL)
Associate Planner Lyon provided an overview on the revised and proposed final development plans as outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Middleton noted concern about renting out the casita units out separately from the main home.
Commission Hudson spoke in support of renting out the casita units which could be beneficial for people who are single, elderly or on a fixed-income - he prefers the HOA have the option to make this decision. He commented that it was good experience to participate as a part of the subcommittee in reviewing this project and thanked the applicant's for their successful response.
The applicant stated that the sale prices for the homes will be between the low $400,000 - $600,000.
Motion to approve Approve the Final Planned Development and Case 3.3974 with conditions, subject to:
1. The applicant shall include a condition in the project's CC&R's limiting the term for rentals to a 30-day minimum rental period to prevent them from being used on a short-term vacation basis.
2. Maintain the pedestrian gates that lead into the common areas of the development unlocked and open from dawn or on a 24-hour/day basis. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve the Final Planned Development and Case 3.3974 with conditions, subject to:
1. The applicant shall include a condition in the project's CC&R's limiting the term for rentals to a 30-day minimum rental period to prevent them from being used on a short-term vacation basis.
2. Maintain the pedestrian gates that lead into the common areas of the development unlocked and open from dawn or on a 24-hour/day basis. (Approved)
A recess was taken at 2:39 pm.
The meeting resumed at 2:50 pm.
3B. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED GENERALLY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PALM CANYON DRIVE AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, ZONE CBD (CASE NOS. 5.1290 PD-361, 3.3605 MAJ, 3.3606 MAJ, 3.3607 MAJ, 3.3785 MAJ, 3.3908 MAJ AND 3.3948 MAJ). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided background information and an overview of the proposed changes.
Technical Questions:
-A comparison of the 2015 plans and current plans.
-The changes made to the plans - removal of the trees, ground material, removal of shade structures, hardscape and light fixtures.
Director Fagg described the discussion (comments and concerns) of the subcommittee meeting of the City Council (Mills, Roberts and the applicant) held on February 1st.
-Consistency of trees on Tahquitz, Belardo and Main Street.
-Seating areas.
-Concern with loss of the water feature -maintenance issues and water spillover.
-Concern with shade structures or misting system on the Palm Canyon frontage.
-Palo Verde or Mesquite specimen trees are appropriate (large enough to provide shade).
-Supported proposed benches.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk noted concern with the Mesquite tree (split if not pruned on a timely manner) and questioned an alternate type.
IVAN ORTIZ, TKD Architects, responded to questions pertaining to landscaping alternate specimen trees,
Vice-Chair Weremiuk has concerns about:
-tree choices.
-removal of trees.
-
Commissioner Hudson noted disappointed with the lack of park benches, seating and trees (preferred the original plan)
-The landscaping looks barren -trees have been removed for cost savings,
-Not enough benches and seating in the public areas.
-Lack of shading.
Commissioner Middleton commented on the need for more shade structures, Mesquite trees can be beautiful in smaller settings; and recommends the Palo Verde tree for the type of promenade location (maintenance during blooming).
Commissioner Donenfeld concurred with Commissioner Hudson and noted the importance of the ground level outdoor experience and needs more furnishings and shading. He cannot support this.
Commissioner Hirschbein commented on:
-The water feature off of Tahquitz Canyon Way has changed.
- Would like to see the 2nd water feature reinstated.
-Removal of trees is not acceptable.
-Likes the palm trees on Tahquitz Canyon.
-Does not like changing the pavers for the colored concrete.
Commissioner Lowe spoke in opposition of the proposed landscape - this is supposed to be a model area for downtown and this is not what was promised (the landscape and streetscape has been elimnated).
Chair Calerdine spoke in favor of the Palo Verde trees and expressed concern that the paseo needs to draw people back - it needs better water features and landscaping.
Motion to approve Deny, and allow the applicant to incorporate the comments made by the Commission.
1. Better specimen trees - with a recommendation of the Palo Verde trees.
2. Keeping the trees on Tahquitz
3. Belardo - keep trees and putting back the water features.
4. Improve shading on Palm Canyon frontage.
5. Bring back the details of the original plan as much as possible.
Placement of bollards are not in the plans.
2. Reduction of trees.
3. 1. Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
lowe, said this is not what was promised. the elimination of landscaping and streetscape Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Deny, and allow the applicant to incorporate the comments made by the Commission.
1. Better specimen trees - with a recommendation of the Palo Verde trees.
2. Keeping the trees on Tahquitz
3. Belardo - keep trees and putting back the water features.
4. Improve shading on Palm Canyon frontage.
5. Bring back the details of the original plan as much as possible.
Placement of bollards are not in the plans.
2. Reduction of trees.
3. 1. Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
lowe, said this is not what was promised. the elimination of landscaping and streetscape (Approved)
2A. CONT'D - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATIONS (CASE 5.1405 ZTA). (FF)
Planning Director Fagg provided an overview of the proposed Zone Text Amendment regarding procedures and criteria for Extension of Time applications.
The Commission requested clarification and/or comments pertaining to:
-Definition of "descretion".
-Needs good cause - not "any" but rather "substantial" efforts have been made.
-A time limit - i.e. no more than a total of 5 years with the exception of exteriating circumstances.
-Determine definition for "for good cause".
-Limitation on time extensions.
The public hearing was opened and closed with no speakers coming forward.
Commissioner Lowe commented on:
-Looking at it from the applicant standpoint: Consideration of developers who have spent millions of dollars to be completed and not know if the entitlement will remain and does not agree with setting a time limit for five years.
Commissioner Middleton commented on:
-Economic viability of the project during the approval project.
-Make it clear that going beyond the 5 years (from the time of the original approval) will extraordinary set of circumstances and community input should be allowed.
Motion to approve Continue to a date certain of February 22, 2017, to allow staff to make changes as directed by the Commission. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to a date certain of February 22, 2017, to allow staff to make changes as directed by the Commission. (Approved)
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
-Sequence of meeting - discussion of Planning Commission by-laws.
-Status of the Downtown Park subcommittee meeting (requested a study session prior to Joint meeting to discuss design).
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Planning Director Fagg reported that at February 22nd meeting a joint meeting with the AAC will be scheduled fo discuss the fire station #4.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 4:20 pm to Wednesday, February 22, 2017, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Feb 08, 2017 Planning Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Calerdine called the meeting to order at 1:35 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 7 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The Agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 6:00 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2017.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The Agenda was accepted, as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Calerdine opened the public comments portion of the meeting:
MC ARVIE CRAWFORD, requested consideration of conducting a traffic study for Indian Canyon Avenue and traffic sign light at Rosa Park vicinity given the developments recently approve that will increase traffic.
JAAK JUHKENTALL, Sundial HOA, stated that the Board of Directors voted in support of the Vibe development; noting that it's a much better commercial design.
There being no further comments Public Comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Commissioner Donenfeld noted his recusal on the minutes due to his absence.
Commissioner Middleton requested a correction on regular meeting minutes, as noted.
Commissioner Hirschbein noted his abstention on the minutes due to his absence.
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 11, 2017 STUDY SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Motion to approve Approve minutes of the January 11, 2017 Study Session and Regular Meeting Minutes, as amended. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve minutes of the January 11, 2017 Study Session and Regular Meeting Minutes, as amended. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Item 2 was moved to the end of the Agenda.
2B. SUNLIGHT PEAK LLC. (DBA: "EPIC HOTEL"), FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CASE 5.1404 CUP) TO ALLOW AN EIGHT (8) UNIT BOUTIQUE HOTEL TO CONTAIN KITCHENS LOCATED AT 275 EAST TAMARISK ROAD, ZONE R-3 (GM). (CASE 5.1404 CUP)
Associate Planner Mlaker provided an overview of the proposed hotel as outlined in the staff report.
Technical Questions:
Vice-Chair Weremiuk:
-Removal of housing units (vacation rentals and condominium conversion) and tenant protection.
-Recent policy from the City Council regarding the preservation of apartment units.
-Noticing requirements for residents.
-Is State relocation available for low-income residents?
-Accessibility requirements for this project.
Commissioner Hirschbein:
-What is the intent of limiting the number of kitchens? Is there an advantage?
Commissioner Middleton:
-Has this been used building used as apartments all this time?
-City Council's right to call items forward.
Commissioner Donenfeld:
-Fire codes.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk:
-Requested condominium conversion ordinance.
Chair Calerdine opened the public hearing:
JIM CIOFFIC, project architect, addressed ADA accessibility of the units. Mr. Cioffi clarified that the apartment house is delapidated (at least of the units are inhabitable) that had issues with drug activity. He clarified the use as a boutique hotel not a condominium conversion.
There being no further speakers the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Middleton said the project is very impressive and verified the number of units are inhabitable, changes made to units by tenants, and notification of conversion for tenants.
She noted concern about housing rental stock and strongly believes tenants should receive notice of conversion.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk thinks the project is beautiful; however, she expressed concern about loss of rental housing and would like City Council to review this project. She made a motion to approve with changes.
Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code.
Commissioner Hirschbein spoke in support of the motion but has a concern about removing affordable rental housing stock from the city.
Motion to approve Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Chair Calerdine.
Vote to approve Approve with Conditions; subject to:
1. Provide a sixty (60) day notice of intent to convert apartment complex to hotel for all current tenants.
2. Property owner to provide Tenant Assistance to occupants as stipulated in Section 9.62.020(F) of the Palm Springs Municipal Code. (Approved)
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
3A. ARMADA REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION, AND A FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR "VIBE", A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 93 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND 72 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON SMALL LOTS ON A 24-ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH FARRELL DRIVE AND EAST BARISTO ROAD, ZONE PD 232 (CASE 5.1046 PDD 232 AMND, 3.3974 MAJ, TTM 36689 AND TPM 36767). (KL)
Associate Planner Lyon provided an overview on the revised and proposed final development plans as outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Middleton noted concern about renting out the casita units out separately from the main home.
Commission Hudson spoke in support of renting out the casita units which could be beneficial for people who are single, elderly or on a fixed-income - he prefers the HOA have the option to make this decision. He commented that it was good experience to participate as a part of the subcommittee in reviewing this project and thanked the applicant's for their successful response.
The applicant stated that the sale prices for the homes will be between the low $400,000 - $600,000.
Motion to approve Approve the Final Planned Development and Case 3.3974 with conditions, subject to:
1. The applicant shall include a condition in the project's CC&R's limiting the term for rentals to a 30-day minimum rental period to prevent them from being used on a short-term vacation basis.
2. Maintain the pedestrian gates that lead into the common areas of the development unlocked and open from dawn or on a 24-hour/day basis. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve the Final Planned Development and Case 3.3974 with conditions, subject to:
1. The applicant shall include a condition in the project's CC&R's limiting the term for rentals to a 30-day minimum rental period to prevent them from being used on a short-term vacation basis.
2. Maintain the pedestrian gates that lead into the common areas of the development unlocked and open from dawn or on a 24-hour/day basis. (Approved)
A recess was taken at 2:39 pm.
The meeting resumed at 2:50 pm.
3B. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED GENERALLY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PALM CANYON DRIVE AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, ZONE CBD (CASE NOS. 5.1290 PD-361, 3.3605 MAJ, 3.3606 MAJ, 3.3607 MAJ, 3.3785 MAJ, 3.3908 MAJ AND 3.3948 MAJ). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided background information and an overview of the proposed changes.
Technical Questions:
-A comparison of the 2015 plans and current plans.
-The changes made to the plans - removal of the trees, ground material, removal of shade structures, hardscape and light fixtures.
Director Fagg described the discussion (comments and concerns) of the subcommittee meeting of the City Council (Mills, Roberts and the applicant) held on February 1st.
-Consistency of trees on Tahquitz, Belardo and Main Street.
-Seating areas.
-Concern with loss of the water feature -maintenance issues and water spillover.
-Concern with shade structures or misting system on the Palm Canyon frontage.
-Palo Verde or Mesquite specimen trees are appropriate (large enough to provide shade).
-Supported proposed benches.
Vice-Chair Weremiuk noted concern with the Mesquite tree (split if not pruned on a timely manner) and questioned an alternate type.
IVAN ORTIZ, TKD Architects, responded to questions pertaining to landscaping alternate specimen trees,
Vice-Chair Weremiuk has concerns about:
-tree choices.
-removal of trees.
-
Commissioner Hudson noted disappointed with the lack of park benches, seating and trees (preferred the original plan)
-The landscaping looks barren -trees have been removed for cost savings,
-Not enough benches and seating in the public areas.
-Lack of shading.
Commissioner Middleton commented on the need for more shade structures, Mesquite trees can be beautiful in smaller settings; and recommends the Palo Verde tree for the type of promenade location (maintenance during blooming).
Commissioner Donenfeld concurred with Commissioner Hudson and noted the importance of the ground level outdoor experience and needs more furnishings and shading. He cannot support this.
Commissioner Hirschbein commented on:
-The water feature off of Tahquitz Canyon Way has changed.
- Would like to see the 2nd water feature reinstated.
-Removal of trees is not acceptable.
-Likes the palm trees on Tahquitz Canyon.
-Does not like changing the pavers for the colored concrete.
Commissioner Lowe spoke in opposition of the proposed landscape - this is supposed to be a model area for downtown and this is not what was promised (the landscape and streetscape has been elimnated).
Chair Calerdine spoke in favor of the Palo Verde trees and expressed concern that the paseo needs to draw people back - it needs better water features and landscaping.
Motion to approve Deny, and allow the applicant to incorporate the comments made by the Commission.
1. Better specimen trees - with a recommendation of the Palo Verde trees.
2. Keeping the trees on Tahquitz
3. Belardo - keep trees and putting back the water features.
4. Improve shading on Palm Canyon frontage.
5. Bring back the details of the original plan as much as possible.
Placement of bollards are not in the plans.
2. Reduction of trees.
3. 1. Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
lowe, said this is not what was promised. the elimination of landscaping and streetscape Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Deny, and allow the applicant to incorporate the comments made by the Commission.
1. Better specimen trees - with a recommendation of the Palo Verde trees.
2. Keeping the trees on Tahquitz
3. Belardo - keep trees and putting back the water features.
4. Improve shading on Palm Canyon frontage.
5. Bring back the details of the original plan as much as possible.
Placement of bollards are not in the plans.
2. Reduction of trees.
3. 1. Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
Benches, lack of shade is lacking.
lowe, said this is not what was promised. the elimination of landscaping and streetscape (Approved)
2A. CONT'D - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATIONS (CASE 5.1405 ZTA). (FF)
Planning Director Fagg provided an overview of the proposed Zone Text Amendment regarding procedures and criteria for Extension of Time applications.
The Commission requested clarification and/or comments pertaining to:
-Definition of "descretion".
-Needs good cause - not "any" but rather "substantial" efforts have been made.
-A time limit - i.e. no more than a total of 5 years with the exception of exteriating circumstances.
-Determine definition for "for good cause".
-Limitation on time extensions.
The public hearing was opened and closed with no speakers coming forward.
Commissioner Lowe commented on:
-Looking at it from the applicant standpoint: Consideration of developers who have spent millions of dollars to be completed and not know if the entitlement will remain and does not agree with setting a time limit for five years.
Commissioner Middleton commented on:
-Economic viability of the project during the approval project.
-Make it clear that going beyond the 5 years (from the time of the original approval) will extraordinary set of circumstances and community input should be allowed.
Motion to approve Continue to a date certain of February 22, 2017, to allow staff to make changes as directed by the Commission. Moved by Vice-Chair Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to a date certain of February 22, 2017, to allow staff to make changes as directed by the Commission. (Approved)
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
-Sequence of meeting - discussion of Planning Commission by-laws.
-Status of the Downtown Park subcommittee meeting (requested a study session prior to Joint meeting to discuss design).
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Planning Director Fagg reported that at February 22nd meeting a joint meeting with the AAC will be scheduled fo discuss the fire station #4.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 4:20 pm to Wednesday, February 22, 2017, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://palmspringsca.new.swagit.com/videos/15094/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item
