Video index
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Klatchko called the meeting to order at 1:33 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 6 members present, 1 members absent, 0 members excused.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 7:00 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2016.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted, as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Klatchko opened public comments:
NORA WILLIAMS, Alexander Estates, Phase IV, president, said they have worked hard on their issues with the developer and spoke in support of the project.
KATHLEEN ADAMS, resides to adjacent to the new Sky Development and the proposed Palm Canyon project, spoke in opposition of Item 2A, said the Sky development is very different than how it was projected to them and the neighborhood is very discouraged.
KENNETH FALCOM, resides in the Historic Tennis Club, spoke in reference of Item 2A, said the hillside developments should be scrutinized more carefully on the overall site and changes of the terrain and suggested accurate elevations of the proposed project.
RON HALLERAH, Big Canyon resident, spoke in reference Sky Development, said his back wall abutts to this new development the lots behind his property are significantly higher. He is requesting lots #5 and #6 be lowered.
DICK OBYETER, resides in the Canyons, his home abutts the Sky Development, said the heights of the homes are very high and this was not was presented.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 14, 2016 STUDY SESSION AND MARCH 23, 2016 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Motion to approve Approve, as submitted. Moved by Vice-Chair Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Approve, as submitted. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2A. WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP ON BEHALF OF PALM CANYON 65, LLC, FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF ZONE CHANGE, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE PROJECT ON 12.4-ACRES CONSISTING OF (57) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON LOTS AVERAGING 5,362-SQUARE FEET IN SIZE, (22) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND APPROXIMATELY 15,893-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE LOCATED AT 777 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (CASE NOS. 5.1378 PD-379, ZC 3.3876 MAJ AND TTM 36914). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell presented the proposed development as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission requested clarification on the following items:
-The total amount of retail off-street parking on Palm Canyon?
-What elements of the Tahquitz Creek Trail will be provided with this project?
-The proposed alternate plan - eliminates the commercial with enhanced landscape buffer.
-Analysis of the General Plan.
-Development Standards.
-Detailed descriptions of the Tahquitz Creek Trail and its connection to the Cameron project.
-Is there a standard in which lots are too small and swimming pools are not permitted?
-A spa uses less water than a pool and a community pool conserves more water too.
-Status of environmental review affecting the alternative plan.
Chair Klatchko opened the public hearing:
-DENNIS CUNNINGHAM, Woodbridge Pacific Group, provided details on the viability of the commercial in this location and issues associate with it. He described the all residential plan including the footprint, elevations, height and floor plans.
FRANK TYSEN, spoke about the lack of public benefit for planned developments and is opposed to the swimming pools to the homes; he urged the Commission to send this back to lower the density.
KATHLEEN ADAMS, resides at The Canyons, expressed concern about the zoning, density height of this project and how it will impact the neighborhood.
KENNETH FALCON, wants to know how it compares to the Cameron project; and thinks it's important to keep the pedestrian access from the new hotel activity in this area.
MARIO GONZALES, developer, does not think the commercial component will work in this location and the residential makes sense. He thinks some of the comments made today could be easily addressed and requested approval of the 3rd plan.
DENNIS CUNNINGHAM, said they are in full compliance with the landscape plan for the Tahquitz Creek Trail and addressed the continuous wall on north side.
There being no further speakers the public hearing was closed.
Vice-Chair Calerdine questioned if its the intention of the project to pave the Tahquitz Creek Trail adjacent to this development from Belardo to Palm Canyon.
Commissioner Weremiuk said she prefers the 3rd plan but has the following concerns:
*The sideyard setbacks at 5 ft. are not acceptable and need to be 10 ft. (some space is needed between the buildings).
*The restrooms in the swimming pool area can be unisex.
*More green space is needed - possibly losing unit #1 adjacent to the pool to encourage use and gathering space for people in the community and access gate to the trail.
*Appreciates that the streets are normal width and cars can park in the driveway.
Lots are a little too small.
Commissioner Middleton noted that a year ago the Mac Gruder and Rock Garden were still in place and occupied illegally. She thinks the project is too dense and there is much to like especially completion of the Tahquitz Creek Master Plan. She asked the applicant to describe the grade of this project and grading heights on Belardo and Palm Canyon. She questioned if HOA would be established and if short-term rentals prohibited. She favored the all-residential option for this location -it seems a viabilie project, sideyard setbacks should be 10 ft, density is too great. However, is less dense than the Cameron project.
Commissioner Hirschbein made comments on:
-No need to compel to do retail.
-Minimum R-1 requirement for lot size, maximum of 35%.
-12 ft. buffer to property line from wall leading to the trail.
-South corner (coming over the bridge) needs more architectural design.
-Incorporating a bike trail on the along Palm Canyon Drive - if width is sufficient.
-Project to return to the AAC.
-Design of the houses are not adequate and need to be more sophisticated.
Commissioner Calerdine said he is happy with the 5 ft. separation and supports the project.
Chair Klatchko likes the 24 ft. height on the multi-family and asked staff for clarification on if bike lanes are allowed Palm Canyon. Staff responded. He suggested along Belardo - minimal landscape presentation enhancement or width in terms of public benefit. Encouraged the applicant to compare the PDD guidelines when approved by the city. He urged the project going back to the AAC for the new multi-family rendering for review.
Motion to approve Continue to date certain of May 11, 2016. Moved by Vice-Chair Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to date certain of May 11, 2016. (Approved)
A recess was taken at 3:03 pm.
The meeting resumed at 3:17 pm.
2B. SERENA PARK - PALM SPRINGS COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED EVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN LIEU OF ZONE CHANGE, MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 125-ACRE OF PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED VACANT LAND FOR 137 ATTACHED RESIDENCES, 292 DETACHED RESIDENCES, STREETS, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC PARK LOCATED NORTH OF VERONA ROAD, EAST OF FARRELL DRIVE, NORTH OF JOYCE DRIVE, EAST OF SUNRISE WAY AND SOUTHWEST OF THE WHITEWATER RIVER WASH, SECTION 36 / TOWNSHIP 3 / RANGE 4, AND SECTION 1 / TOWNSHIP 4 / RANGE 4 (CASE NOS. 5.1327 PD-366, ZC, MAJ AND TTM 36691). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided an over of the proposed development as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission asked technical questions pertaining:
-Have the dimensions for the lots changed on the alternate plan?
-Public Benefit?
-Details on the traffic control at Farrell and Racquet Club. Traffic anaylisis was conducted.
-Status of public park.
-Acquiring access points on Golden Sand and Whitewater Country and relocating the gate.
-Attainment of fees for Open-Space.
-Transfer of density.
-Mitigation measures.
-The City work with the developer and Tribe to obtain access from Verona to Gene Autry for the construction.
-CV Link details.
Chair Klatchko opened the public hearing:
-ERIC TAYLOR, applicant, Serena Park, addressed questions from the Commission regarding: streets, mitigation of construction traffic, the park, the Whitewater access connection, CV Link (pedestrian & bike path), lot widths, setbacks and the alternate plan.
The following persons spoke in
opposition
of the proposed project:
-KENNETH MAU, Gene Autry Neighborhood, chairman, expressed concern with the traffic access going through their neighborhood and urged the Commission to put this on hold until the issues are resolved.
RENEE SAUNDERS, resides on Verona Road, expressed concern with traffic and loss of views; she suggested reducing the density of the project.
JERRY COLLAMER, resides adjacent to the old 18th fairway, spoke about traffic congestion, loss of open-space and urged more study.
JEFF DI AVANZON, spoke about the density; he urged the Commission to reconsider amending the General Plan designation.
The following persons spoke in
favor
of the proposed project:
ROGER CONWAY, resides adjacent to Golden Sands, said that a public benefit for him will be the end of bike races and random gun shots behind his residence. He requested expedious approval of the proposed project.
DIANA GRACE, Four Seasons, treasurer & board of directors member, Four Seasons, submitted letters from many the homeowners in favor of this project because of increase in property values, elimination of defunct golf course, blowing sand and noted that it will enhance the city as a whole.
DONALD BROODHURST, concerned with access points into Verona and Whitewater Country Club and suggested other streets.
DAN HUGHETT, spoke about the entrance issues that will add traffic congestion; he suggested leaving the site as a park.
VICTOR DEFOE, Whitewater Condominiums, Phase II, said the board is not in favor of transferring or selling of their streets for access to this development. However, he thinks the benefits of this development outweight the detriments.
TERI MC COPLIN, PS Country Club HOA, said a very low density project is too dense to absord and could increase the potential of flooding to her neighborhood.
RONALD HERISKO, PS Country Club, boardmember, Phase III, expressed concern with the increased homes that will greatly increase the traffic congestion and suggested decreasing the number of homes.
There being no further appearances the public hearing was closed.
Chair Klatchko asked the applicant if they considered expanding the park area to keep the open-space in this community.
Motion to approve Approve the project, subject to the following additional conditions:
1. Traffic
a. Accept Golden Sands as a public street.
b. "Spine” road through the project is to be a public street.
c. A minimum of three points of access shall be required to the project, with the preference for the additional entrance at Farrell/Racquet Club (with the applicant to provide a new gate for residents of Palm Springs Country Club); alternate choice for third point of access is Francis Drive.
d. Traffic mitigation to be provided at Farrell/Racquet Club, and at Whitewater Club Drive and Vista Chino. Finding: Without the provision of a third access point to the development, there will be an unfair traffic burden to the adjoining neighborhoods.
2. Construction Issues
a. A construction phasing plan shall be required at the Final PD review.
b. The City shall work with the landowner southeast of the project site to provide temporary construction access through to
Gene
Autry.
c. The “spine” road shall be built out as a construction road from Golden Sands to Whitewater Club Drive; full completion of the “spine” road shall be required at the completion of Phase I of the development.
d. Construction traffic shall be prohibited from traveling through residential neighborhoods on Via Escuela, Whitewater Club Drive, and Verona Road.
Environmental
a. Applicant shall be required to adhere to Engineering Condition #43 relative to flood control issues.
b. The applicant shall be required to adhere to Mitigation Measure 4.2-9 relative to wind fencing around construction sites and maintenance of dust control over the entire site.
c. The applicant shall be required to provide appropriate mitigation of any hazardous materials found on the site.
4. Density
a. Fifty percent (50%) of the site shall be retained as open space; in determining the open space, the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash may be included in the calculation. Amenities such as private parks, public parks, greenbelts, CV Link trails, and other similar amenities may be included in the required open space areas.
b. The total number of units shall be reduced to 386 units, representing a 10% decrease.
Finding: There is a disparate impact of not following the grid model of traffic dispersal and impacts to adjoining neighborhoods; reducing density will assist in reducing traffic impacts.
5. CV Link
a. A trail shall be provided through the property whether CV Link approves the alignment. The trail shall have a 24’ right-of-way in a 50’ wide greenbelt.
b. The applicant shall consider moving the alignment of the trail along the levee for the southern portion of the project. c. The proposed street along Joyce Drive shall be moved further away from the existing homes so as to accommodate the trail alignment.
d. Allow a pedestrian gate from the Golden Sands Trailer Park to the trail, and allow a pedestrian gate from Savannah Way to the trail if desired by the residents of Four Seasons development.
6. Open Space
a. The applicant shall donate the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash to the City.
b. The levee shall be improved as park or trail area, and count towards the open space requirement.
7. Landscape
a. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved as part of the Final PD application.
8. Gates
a. The “spine” road and the three access points shall not be gated.
b. Only the age-restricted portion of the development shall be allowed to have restricted access gates.
9. Sidewalks
a. Public streets shall be required to have sidewalks along at least one side of the street.
b. The age-restricted portion of the development shall also be required to have sidewalks.
10. Age-Restricted Housing
a. The hammerhead design shall be eliminated in favor of c-shaped or u-shaped access driveways.
11. Parking
a. In the age-restricted portion of the development, guest parking shall be provided if streets aren’t wide enough to accommodate on-street parking.
12. Unit Design
a. Review and approval of the unit design standards shall be deferred to the Final PD application. The architecture of the units should reference the design of the Alexander Estates or the Cody-designed units within the Palm Springs Country Club.
b. The maximum height of the residential units shall be limited to 19’.
c. A minimum 10’ setback shall be required for all product except the age-restricted portion of the development, with a preference for zero-lot line or use easements to maximize use of the side-yard space.
d. The perimeter wall around the Palm Springs Country Club shall be one consistent wall type, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as part of the Final PD application.
13. Park a. A public park shall be provided within the development, and shall be maintained by the HOA.
14. Residential Amenities
a. No residential amenities are currently shown on the proposed site plan; a proposal for residential amenities, including parks and other recreational amenities, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
b. A common clubhouse and pool shall be provided in the age-restricted portion of the development.
15. Public Benefit. In accordance with the adopted City Council policy, the following items shall be considered as public benefits:
a. CV Link trail alignment or other public access path through the site.
b. Provision of 50% open space.
c. Public through-street (“spine” road).
d. Park (maintained by HOA).
e. Conservation measures:
1) Additional water conservation such as graywater systems (plumb and offer as an option).
2) Provide a percentage of solar power for units (such as 40% of usage capacity).
3) All landscape lighting and outdoor lighting shall utilize LED fixtures. 4)
All structures shall conform to the Green for Life building program “Green Tree” level.
16. Development Agreement
a. This approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant entering into a development agreement with the City.
17. Agreements with Adjacent HOA’s/Neighborhood Organizations
a. The applicant’s agreements with any adjacent HOA/neighborhood organization shall be memorialized as part of this approval. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve the project, subject to the following additional conditions:
1. Traffic
a. Accept Golden Sands as a public street.
b. "Spine” road through the project is to be a public street.
c. A minimum of three points of access shall be required to the project, with the preference for the additional entrance at Farrell/Racquet Club (with the applicant to provide a new gate for residents of Palm Springs Country Club); alternate choice for third point of access is Francis Drive.
d. Traffic mitigation to be provided at Farrell/Racquet Club, and at Whitewater Club Drive and Vista Chino. Finding: Without the provision of a third access point to the development, there will be an unfair traffic burden to the adjoining neighborhoods.
2. Construction Issues
a. A construction phasing plan shall be required at the Final PD review.
b. The City shall work with the landowner southeast of the project site to provide temporary construction access through to
Gene
Autry.
c. The “spine” road shall be built out as a construction road from Golden Sands to Whitewater Club Drive; full completion of the “spine” road shall be required at the completion of Phase I of the development.
d. Construction traffic shall be prohibited from traveling through residential neighborhoods on Via Escuela, Whitewater Club Drive, and Verona Road.
Environmental
a. Applicant shall be required to adhere to Engineering Condition #43 relative to flood control issues.
b. The applicant shall be required to adhere to Mitigation Measure 4.2-9 relative to wind fencing around construction sites and maintenance of dust control over the entire site.
c. The applicant shall be required to provide appropriate mitigation of any hazardous materials found on the site.
4. Density
a. Fifty percent (50%) of the site shall be retained as open space; in determining the open space, the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash may be included in the calculation. Amenities such as private parks, public parks, greenbelts, CV Link trails, and other similar amenities may be included in the required open space areas.
b. The total number of units shall be reduced to 386 units, representing a 10% decrease.
Finding: There is a disparate impact of not following the grid model of traffic dispersal and impacts to adjoining neighborhoods; reducing density will assist in reducing traffic impacts.
5. CV Link
a. A trail shall be provided through the property whether CV Link approves the alignment. The trail shall have a 24’ right-of-way in a 50’ wide greenbelt.
b. The applicant shall consider moving the alignment of the trail along the levee for the southern portion of the project. c. The proposed street along Joyce Drive shall be moved further away from the existing homes so as to accommodate the trail alignment.
d. Allow a pedestrian gate from the Golden Sands Trailer Park to the trail, and allow a pedestrian gate from Savannah Way to the trail if desired by the residents of Four Seasons development.
6. Open Space
a. The applicant shall donate the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash to the City.
b. The levee shall be improved as park or trail area, and count towards the open space requirement.
7. Landscape
a. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved as part of the Final PD application.
8. Gates
a. The “spine” road and the three access points shall not be gated.
b. Only the age-restricted portion of the development shall be allowed to have restricted access gates.
9. Sidewalks
a. Public streets shall be required to have sidewalks along at least one side of the street.
b. The age-restricted portion of the development shall also be required to have sidewalks.
10. Age-Restricted Housing
a. The hammerhead design shall be eliminated in favor of c-shaped or u-shaped access driveways.
11. Parking
a. In the age-restricted portion of the development, guest parking shall be provided if streets aren’t wide enough to accommodate on-street parking.
12. Unit Design
a. Review and approval of the unit design standards shall be deferred to the Final PD application. The architecture of the units should reference the design of the Alexander Estates or the Cody-designed units within the Palm Springs Country Club.
b. The maximum height of the residential units shall be limited to 19’.
c. A minimum 10’ setback shall be required for all product except the age-restricted portion of the development, with a preference for zero-lot line or use easements to maximize use of the side-yard space.
d. The perimeter wall around the Palm Springs Country Club shall be one consistent wall type, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as part of the Final PD application.
13. Park a. A public park shall be provided within the development, and shall be maintained by the HOA.
14. Residential Amenities
a. No residential amenities are currently shown on the proposed site plan; a proposal for residential amenities, including parks and other recreational amenities, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
b. A common clubhouse and pool shall be provided in the age-restricted portion of the development.
15. Public Benefit. In accordance with the adopted City Council policy, the following items shall be considered as public benefits:
a. CV Link trail alignment or other public access path through the site.
b. Provision of 50% open space.
c. Public through-street (“spine” road).
d. Park (maintained by HOA).
e. Conservation measures:
1) Additional water conservation such as graywater systems (plumb and offer as an option).
2) Provide a percentage of solar power for units (such as 40% of usage capacity).
3) All landscape lighting and outdoor lighting shall utilize LED fixtures. 4)
All structures shall conform to the Green for Life building program “Green Tree” level.
16. Development Agreement
a. This approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant entering into a development agreement with the City.
17. Agreements with Adjacent HOA’s/Neighborhood Organizations
a. The applicant’s agreements with any adjacent HOA/neighborhood organization shall be memorialized as part of this approval. (Approved)
2C. SERENA PARK - PALM SPRINGS COUNTRY CLUB LLC, FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE REDEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 125-ACRE OF PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED VACANT LAND FOR 137 ATTACHED RESIDENCES, 292 DETACHED RESIDENCES, STREETS, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC PARK LOCATED NORTH OF VERONA ROAD, EAST OF FARRELL DRIVE, NORTH OF JOYCE DRIVE, EAST OF SUNRISE WAY AND SOUTHWEST OF THE WHITEWATER RIVER WASH, SECTION 36 / TOWNSHIP 3 / RANGE 4, AND SECTION 1 /TOWNSHIP 4 / RANGE 4 (CASE NOS. 5.1327 DA). (DN)
Motion to approve Continue Items 2C and 3A to a date certain of April 27, 2016. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Weremiuk.
Vote to approve Continue Items 2C and 3A to a date certain of April 27, 2016. (Approved)
3. NEW BUSINESS:
3B. RUDY DVORAK AND CLIVE WILKINSON REQUEST TO ABANDON AND VACATE A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN A VACATED PORTION OF PATENCIO ROAD; BETWEEN LINDA VISTA DRIVE AND RAMON ROAD, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 4 EAST, S.B.M., (ENGINEERING FILE R 15-14). (ER)
Item was tabled.
3A. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC, OWNER, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE BLOCK A BUILDING LOCATED WITHIN THE MUSEUM MARKET PLAZA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PALM CANYON DRIVE AND ANDREAS ROAD, ZONE CBD, SECTION 15 (CASE SP 16-002). (DN)
Item was moved to continue to a date certain of April 27, 2016.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
None.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Planning Director Fagg reminded the Planning Commission of the upcoming Joint Meeting with the Architectural Advisory Committee, Planning Commission and City Council on April 20, 2016 to discuss the changes to the Downtown Specific Plan.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 5:54 pm to 1:30 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2016, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Apr 13, 2016 Planning Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Klatchko called the meeting to order at 1:33 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 6 members present, 1 members absent, 0 members excused.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 7:00 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2016.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted, as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Klatchko opened public comments:
NORA WILLIAMS, Alexander Estates, Phase IV, president, said they have worked hard on their issues with the developer and spoke in support of the project.
KATHLEEN ADAMS, resides to adjacent to the new Sky Development and the proposed Palm Canyon project, spoke in opposition of Item 2A, said the Sky development is very different than how it was projected to them and the neighborhood is very discouraged.
KENNETH FALCOM, resides in the Historic Tennis Club, spoke in reference of Item 2A, said the hillside developments should be scrutinized more carefully on the overall site and changes of the terrain and suggested accurate elevations of the proposed project.
RON HALLERAH, Big Canyon resident, spoke in reference Sky Development, said his back wall abutts to this new development the lots behind his property are significantly higher. He is requesting lots #5 and #6 be lowered.
DICK OBYETER, resides in the Canyons, his home abutts the Sky Development, said the heights of the homes are very high and this was not was presented.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 14, 2016 STUDY SESSION AND MARCH 23, 2016 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Motion to approve Approve, as submitted. Moved by Vice-Chair Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Approve, as submitted. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2A. WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP ON BEHALF OF PALM CANYON 65, LLC, FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN LIEU OF ZONE CHANGE, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE PROJECT ON 12.4-ACRES CONSISTING OF (57) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON LOTS AVERAGING 5,362-SQUARE FEET IN SIZE, (22) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND APPROXIMATELY 15,893-SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE LOCATED AT 777 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE (CASE NOS. 5.1378 PD-379, ZC 3.3876 MAJ AND TTM 36914). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell presented the proposed development as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission requested clarification on the following items:
-The total amount of retail off-street parking on Palm Canyon?
-What elements of the Tahquitz Creek Trail will be provided with this project?
-The proposed alternate plan - eliminates the commercial with enhanced landscape buffer.
-Analysis of the General Plan.
-Development Standards.
-Detailed descriptions of the Tahquitz Creek Trail and its connection to the Cameron project.
-Is there a standard in which lots are too small and swimming pools are not permitted?
-A spa uses less water than a pool and a community pool conserves more water too.
-Status of environmental review affecting the alternative plan.
Chair Klatchko opened the public hearing:
-DENNIS CUNNINGHAM, Woodbridge Pacific Group, provided details on the viability of the commercial in this location and issues associate with it. He described the all residential plan including the footprint, elevations, height and floor plans.
FRANK TYSEN, spoke about the lack of public benefit for planned developments and is opposed to the swimming pools to the homes; he urged the Commission to send this back to lower the density.
KATHLEEN ADAMS, resides at The Canyons, expressed concern about the zoning, density height of this project and how it will impact the neighborhood.
KENNETH FALCON, wants to know how it compares to the Cameron project; and thinks it's important to keep the pedestrian access from the new hotel activity in this area.
MARIO GONZALES, developer, does not think the commercial component will work in this location and the residential makes sense. He thinks some of the comments made today could be easily addressed and requested approval of the 3rd plan.
DENNIS CUNNINGHAM, said they are in full compliance with the landscape plan for the Tahquitz Creek Trail and addressed the continuous wall on north side.
There being no further speakers the public hearing was closed.
Vice-Chair Calerdine questioned if its the intention of the project to pave the Tahquitz Creek Trail adjacent to this development from Belardo to Palm Canyon.
Commissioner Weremiuk said she prefers the 3rd plan but has the following concerns:
*The sideyard setbacks at 5 ft. are not acceptable and need to be 10 ft. (some space is needed between the buildings).
*The restrooms in the swimming pool area can be unisex.
*More green space is needed - possibly losing unit #1 adjacent to the pool to encourage use and gathering space for people in the community and access gate to the trail.
*Appreciates that the streets are normal width and cars can park in the driveway.
Lots are a little too small.
Commissioner Middleton noted that a year ago the Mac Gruder and Rock Garden were still in place and occupied illegally. She thinks the project is too dense and there is much to like especially completion of the Tahquitz Creek Master Plan. She asked the applicant to describe the grade of this project and grading heights on Belardo and Palm Canyon. She questioned if HOA would be established and if short-term rentals prohibited. She favored the all-residential option for this location -it seems a viabilie project, sideyard setbacks should be 10 ft, density is too great. However, is less dense than the Cameron project.
Commissioner Hirschbein made comments on:
-No need to compel to do retail.
-Minimum R-1 requirement for lot size, maximum of 35%.
-12 ft. buffer to property line from wall leading to the trail.
-South corner (coming over the bridge) needs more architectural design.
-Incorporating a bike trail on the along Palm Canyon Drive - if width is sufficient.
-Project to return to the AAC.
-Design of the houses are not adequate and need to be more sophisticated.
Commissioner Calerdine said he is happy with the 5 ft. separation and supports the project.
Chair Klatchko likes the 24 ft. height on the multi-family and asked staff for clarification on if bike lanes are allowed Palm Canyon. Staff responded. He suggested along Belardo - minimal landscape presentation enhancement or width in terms of public benefit. Encouraged the applicant to compare the PDD guidelines when approved by the city. He urged the project going back to the AAC for the new multi-family rendering for review.
Motion to approve Continue to date certain of May 11, 2016. Moved by Vice-Chair Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to date certain of May 11, 2016. (Approved)
A recess was taken at 3:03 pm.
The meeting resumed at 3:17 pm.
2B. SERENA PARK - PALM SPRINGS COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED EVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN LIEU OF ZONE CHANGE, MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 125-ACRE OF PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED VACANT LAND FOR 137 ATTACHED RESIDENCES, 292 DETACHED RESIDENCES, STREETS, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC PARK LOCATED NORTH OF VERONA ROAD, EAST OF FARRELL DRIVE, NORTH OF JOYCE DRIVE, EAST OF SUNRISE WAY AND SOUTHWEST OF THE WHITEWATER RIVER WASH, SECTION 36 / TOWNSHIP 3 / RANGE 4, AND SECTION 1 / TOWNSHIP 4 / RANGE 4 (CASE NOS. 5.1327 PD-366, ZC, MAJ AND TTM 36691). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided an over of the proposed development as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission asked technical questions pertaining:
-Have the dimensions for the lots changed on the alternate plan?
-Public Benefit?
-Details on the traffic control at Farrell and Racquet Club. Traffic anaylisis was conducted.
-Status of public park.
-Acquiring access points on Golden Sand and Whitewater Country and relocating the gate.
-Attainment of fees for Open-Space.
-Transfer of density.
-Mitigation measures.
-The City work with the developer and Tribe to obtain access from Verona to Gene Autry for the construction.
-CV Link details.
Chair Klatchko opened the public hearing:
-ERIC TAYLOR, applicant, Serena Park, addressed questions from the Commission regarding: streets, mitigation of construction traffic, the park, the Whitewater access connection, CV Link (pedestrian & bike path), lot widths, setbacks and the alternate plan.
The following persons spoke in
opposition
of the proposed project:
-KENNETH MAU, Gene Autry Neighborhood, chairman, expressed concern with the traffic access going through their neighborhood and urged the Commission to put this on hold until the issues are resolved.
RENEE SAUNDERS, resides on Verona Road, expressed concern with traffic and loss of views; she suggested reducing the density of the project.
JERRY COLLAMER, resides adjacent to the old 18th fairway, spoke about traffic congestion, loss of open-space and urged more study.
JEFF DI AVANZON, spoke about the density; he urged the Commission to reconsider amending the General Plan designation.
The following persons spoke in
favor
of the proposed project:
ROGER CONWAY, resides adjacent to Golden Sands, said that a public benefit for him will be the end of bike races and random gun shots behind his residence. He requested expedious approval of the proposed project.
DIANA GRACE, Four Seasons, treasurer & board of directors member, Four Seasons, submitted letters from many the homeowners in favor of this project because of increase in property values, elimination of defunct golf course, blowing sand and noted that it will enhance the city as a whole.
DONALD BROODHURST, concerned with access points into Verona and Whitewater Country Club and suggested other streets.
DAN HUGHETT, spoke about the entrance issues that will add traffic congestion; he suggested leaving the site as a park.
VICTOR DEFOE, Whitewater Condominiums, Phase II, said the board is not in favor of transferring or selling of their streets for access to this development. However, he thinks the benefits of this development outweight the detriments.
TERI MC COPLIN, PS Country Club HOA, said a very low density project is too dense to absord and could increase the potential of flooding to her neighborhood.
RONALD HERISKO, PS Country Club, boardmember, Phase III, expressed concern with the increased homes that will greatly increase the traffic congestion and suggested decreasing the number of homes.
There being no further appearances the public hearing was closed.
Chair Klatchko asked the applicant if they considered expanding the park area to keep the open-space in this community.
Motion to approve Approve the project, subject to the following additional conditions:
1. Traffic
a. Accept Golden Sands as a public street.
b. "Spine” road through the project is to be a public street.
c. A minimum of three points of access shall be required to the project, with the preference for the additional entrance at Farrell/Racquet Club (with the applicant to provide a new gate for residents of Palm Springs Country Club); alternate choice for third point of access is Francis Drive.
d. Traffic mitigation to be provided at Farrell/Racquet Club, and at Whitewater Club Drive and Vista Chino. Finding: Without the provision of a third access point to the development, there will be an unfair traffic burden to the adjoining neighborhoods.
2. Construction Issues
a. A construction phasing plan shall be required at the Final PD review.
b. The City shall work with the landowner southeast of the project site to provide temporary construction access through to
Gene
Autry.
c. The “spine” road shall be built out as a construction road from Golden Sands to Whitewater Club Drive; full completion of the “spine” road shall be required at the completion of Phase I of the development.
d. Construction traffic shall be prohibited from traveling through residential neighborhoods on Via Escuela, Whitewater Club Drive, and Verona Road.
Environmental
a. Applicant shall be required to adhere to Engineering Condition #43 relative to flood control issues.
b. The applicant shall be required to adhere to Mitigation Measure 4.2-9 relative to wind fencing around construction sites and maintenance of dust control over the entire site.
c. The applicant shall be required to provide appropriate mitigation of any hazardous materials found on the site.
4. Density
a. Fifty percent (50%) of the site shall be retained as open space; in determining the open space, the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash may be included in the calculation. Amenities such as private parks, public parks, greenbelts, CV Link trails, and other similar amenities may be included in the required open space areas.
b. The total number of units shall be reduced to 386 units, representing a 10% decrease.
Finding: There is a disparate impact of not following the grid model of traffic dispersal and impacts to adjoining neighborhoods; reducing density will assist in reducing traffic impacts.
5. CV Link
a. A trail shall be provided through the property whether CV Link approves the alignment. The trail shall have a 24’ right-of-way in a 50’ wide greenbelt.
b. The applicant shall consider moving the alignment of the trail along the levee for the southern portion of the project. c. The proposed street along Joyce Drive shall be moved further away from the existing homes so as to accommodate the trail alignment.
d. Allow a pedestrian gate from the Golden Sands Trailer Park to the trail, and allow a pedestrian gate from Savannah Way to the trail if desired by the residents of Four Seasons development.
6. Open Space
a. The applicant shall donate the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash to the City.
b. The levee shall be improved as park or trail area, and count towards the open space requirement.
7. Landscape
a. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved as part of the Final PD application.
8. Gates
a. The “spine” road and the three access points shall not be gated.
b. Only the age-restricted portion of the development shall be allowed to have restricted access gates.
9. Sidewalks
a. Public streets shall be required to have sidewalks along at least one side of the street.
b. The age-restricted portion of the development shall also be required to have sidewalks.
10. Age-Restricted Housing
a. The hammerhead design shall be eliminated in favor of c-shaped or u-shaped access driveways.
11. Parking
a. In the age-restricted portion of the development, guest parking shall be provided if streets aren’t wide enough to accommodate on-street parking.
12. Unit Design
a. Review and approval of the unit design standards shall be deferred to the Final PD application. The architecture of the units should reference the design of the Alexander Estates or the Cody-designed units within the Palm Springs Country Club.
b. The maximum height of the residential units shall be limited to 19’.
c. A minimum 10’ setback shall be required for all product except the age-restricted portion of the development, with a preference for zero-lot line or use easements to maximize use of the side-yard space.
d. The perimeter wall around the Palm Springs Country Club shall be one consistent wall type, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as part of the Final PD application.
13. Park a. A public park shall be provided within the development, and shall be maintained by the HOA.
14. Residential Amenities
a. No residential amenities are currently shown on the proposed site plan; a proposal for residential amenities, including parks and other recreational amenities, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
b. A common clubhouse and pool shall be provided in the age-restricted portion of the development.
15. Public Benefit. In accordance with the adopted City Council policy, the following items shall be considered as public benefits:
a. CV Link trail alignment or other public access path through the site.
b. Provision of 50% open space.
c. Public through-street (“spine” road).
d. Park (maintained by HOA).
e. Conservation measures:
1) Additional water conservation such as graywater systems (plumb and offer as an option).
2) Provide a percentage of solar power for units (such as 40% of usage capacity).
3) All landscape lighting and outdoor lighting shall utilize LED fixtures. 4)
All structures shall conform to the Green for Life building program “Green Tree” level.
16. Development Agreement
a. This approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant entering into a development agreement with the City.
17. Agreements with Adjacent HOA’s/Neighborhood Organizations
a. The applicant’s agreements with any adjacent HOA/neighborhood organization shall be memorialized as part of this approval. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approve Approve the project, subject to the following additional conditions:
1. Traffic
a. Accept Golden Sands as a public street.
b. "Spine” road through the project is to be a public street.
c. A minimum of three points of access shall be required to the project, with the preference for the additional entrance at Farrell/Racquet Club (with the applicant to provide a new gate for residents of Palm Springs Country Club); alternate choice for third point of access is Francis Drive.
d. Traffic mitigation to be provided at Farrell/Racquet Club, and at Whitewater Club Drive and Vista Chino. Finding: Without the provision of a third access point to the development, there will be an unfair traffic burden to the adjoining neighborhoods.
2. Construction Issues
a. A construction phasing plan shall be required at the Final PD review.
b. The City shall work with the landowner southeast of the project site to provide temporary construction access through to
Gene
Autry.
c. The “spine” road shall be built out as a construction road from Golden Sands to Whitewater Club Drive; full completion of the “spine” road shall be required at the completion of Phase I of the development.
d. Construction traffic shall be prohibited from traveling through residential neighborhoods on Via Escuela, Whitewater Club Drive, and Verona Road.
Environmental
a. Applicant shall be required to adhere to Engineering Condition #43 relative to flood control issues.
b. The applicant shall be required to adhere to Mitigation Measure 4.2-9 relative to wind fencing around construction sites and maintenance of dust control over the entire site.
c. The applicant shall be required to provide appropriate mitigation of any hazardous materials found on the site.
4. Density
a. Fifty percent (50%) of the site shall be retained as open space; in determining the open space, the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash may be included in the calculation. Amenities such as private parks, public parks, greenbelts, CV Link trails, and other similar amenities may be included in the required open space areas.
b. The total number of units shall be reduced to 386 units, representing a 10% decrease.
Finding: There is a disparate impact of not following the grid model of traffic dispersal and impacts to adjoining neighborhoods; reducing density will assist in reducing traffic impacts.
5. CV Link
a. A trail shall be provided through the property whether CV Link approves the alignment. The trail shall have a 24’ right-of-way in a 50’ wide greenbelt.
b. The applicant shall consider moving the alignment of the trail along the levee for the southern portion of the project. c. The proposed street along Joyce Drive shall be moved further away from the existing homes so as to accommodate the trail alignment.
d. Allow a pedestrian gate from the Golden Sands Trailer Park to the trail, and allow a pedestrian gate from Savannah Way to the trail if desired by the residents of Four Seasons development.
6. Open Space
a. The applicant shall donate the 25 acres within the Whitewater Wash to the City.
b. The levee shall be improved as park or trail area, and count towards the open space requirement.
7. Landscape
a. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved as part of the Final PD application.
8. Gates
a. The “spine” road and the three access points shall not be gated.
b. Only the age-restricted portion of the development shall be allowed to have restricted access gates.
9. Sidewalks
a. Public streets shall be required to have sidewalks along at least one side of the street.
b. The age-restricted portion of the development shall also be required to have sidewalks.
10. Age-Restricted Housing
a. The hammerhead design shall be eliminated in favor of c-shaped or u-shaped access driveways.
11. Parking
a. In the age-restricted portion of the development, guest parking shall be provided if streets aren’t wide enough to accommodate on-street parking.
12. Unit Design
a. Review and approval of the unit design standards shall be deferred to the Final PD application. The architecture of the units should reference the design of the Alexander Estates or the Cody-designed units within the Palm Springs Country Club.
b. The maximum height of the residential units shall be limited to 19’.
c. A minimum 10’ setback shall be required for all product except the age-restricted portion of the development, with a preference for zero-lot line or use easements to maximize use of the side-yard space.
d. The perimeter wall around the Palm Springs Country Club shall be one consistent wall type, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission as part of the Final PD application.
13. Park a. A public park shall be provided within the development, and shall be maintained by the HOA.
14. Residential Amenities
a. No residential amenities are currently shown on the proposed site plan; a proposal for residential amenities, including parks and other recreational amenities, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
b. A common clubhouse and pool shall be provided in the age-restricted portion of the development.
15. Public Benefit. In accordance with the adopted City Council policy, the following items shall be considered as public benefits:
a. CV Link trail alignment or other public access path through the site.
b. Provision of 50% open space.
c. Public through-street (“spine” road).
d. Park (maintained by HOA).
e. Conservation measures:
1) Additional water conservation such as graywater systems (plumb and offer as an option).
2) Provide a percentage of solar power for units (such as 40% of usage capacity).
3) All landscape lighting and outdoor lighting shall utilize LED fixtures. 4)
All structures shall conform to the Green for Life building program “Green Tree” level.
16. Development Agreement
a. This approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant entering into a development agreement with the City.
17. Agreements with Adjacent HOA’s/Neighborhood Organizations
a. The applicant’s agreements with any adjacent HOA/neighborhood organization shall be memorialized as part of this approval. (Approved)
2C. SERENA PARK - PALM SPRINGS COUNTRY CLUB LLC, FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE REDEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 125-ACRE OF PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED VACANT LAND FOR 137 ATTACHED RESIDENCES, 292 DETACHED RESIDENCES, STREETS, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC PARK LOCATED NORTH OF VERONA ROAD, EAST OF FARRELL DRIVE, NORTH OF JOYCE DRIVE, EAST OF SUNRISE WAY AND SOUTHWEST OF THE WHITEWATER RIVER WASH, SECTION 36 / TOWNSHIP 3 / RANGE 4, AND SECTION 1 /TOWNSHIP 4 / RANGE 4 (CASE NOS. 5.1327 DA). (DN)
Motion to approve Continue Items 2C and 3A to a date certain of April 27, 2016. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Weremiuk.
Vote to approve Continue Items 2C and 3A to a date certain of April 27, 2016. (Approved)
3. NEW BUSINESS:
3B. RUDY DVORAK AND CLIVE WILKINSON REQUEST TO ABANDON AND VACATE A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN A VACATED PORTION OF PATENCIO ROAD; BETWEEN LINDA VISTA DRIVE AND RAMON ROAD, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 4 EAST, S.B.M., (ENGINEERING FILE R 15-14). (ER)
Item was tabled.
3A. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC, OWNER, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE BLOCK A BUILDING LOCATED WITHIN THE MUSEUM MARKET PLAZA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PALM CANYON DRIVE AND ANDREAS ROAD, ZONE CBD, SECTION 15 (CASE SP 16-002). (DN)
Item was moved to continue to a date certain of April 27, 2016.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
None.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Planning Director Fagg reminded the Planning Commission of the upcoming Joint Meeting with the Architectural Advisory Committee, Planning Commission and City Council on April 20, 2016 to discuss the changes to the Downtown Specific Plan.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 5:54 pm to 1:30 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2016, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://palmspringsca.new.swagit.com/videos/15072/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item