Video index
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Klatchko called the meeting to order at 1:31 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 7 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
Staff Liaisons:
Flinn Fagg, AICP, Director of Planning Services
Michael Daudt, City Attorney
Terri Hintz, Planning Administrative Coordinator
Savat Khamphou, Assistant Director of Public Works
Glenn Mlaker, AICP, Assistant Planner
David Newell, Associate Planner
Edward Robertson, Principal Planner
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 6:00 pm on Thursday, September 17, 2015.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Commissioner Middleton requested Item 1C pulled from Consent Calender for separate discussion.
Commissioner Weremiuk noted her abstention on minutes of August 12, 2015.
Commissioner Calerdine requested Item 1B pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion.
Director Fagg provided an update on the request that was received to continue Item 2A and recommended the item be heard.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Klatchko opened public comments:
-CURT CLINE, spoke in support of Item 1B.
-RON BOWDOIN, representing Chill Bar, Item 3B, indicated that the sound engineer is available for questions on this matter.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: AUGUST 12, 2015
Motion to approve Approve the Minutes of August 12, 2015. Moved by Commissioner Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Approve the Minutes of August 12, 2015. (Approved)
1B. CURT AND ATSUKO CLINE FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,280-SQUARE FOOT HOUSE ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE LOCATED AT 114 WEST SAN MARCO WAY, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.3885 MAJ). (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker provided an overview of the proposed construction house on a major thoroughfare.
Commissioner Calerdine requested more information on the landscaping on the west and north side.
Commissioner Roberts said the house is beautiful and is an excellent use of this small parcel good.
Motion to approve Approve as submitted with conditions. Moved by Commissioner Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Weremiuk.
Vote to approve Approve as submitted with conditions. (Approved)
1C. JAVIER MORENO REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION BY TO CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,427-SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A 19,395-SQUARE FOOT PARCEL ALONG A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AT 2580 NORTH SUNRISE WAY, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.3903-MAJ). (ER)
Commissioner Middleton said it's an excellent use of the property; however, questioned the location of the pool equipment near the property line on the northeast corner.
Staff responded that they will work with the applicant to see if the pool equipment can be relocated.
Commissioner Middleton requested the guest house cannot be used as a short term rental, separate from the full home.
Commissioner Weremiuk suggested looking at imposing a requirement that pool equipment be located five feet from the property line.
Motion to approve Approve as recommended by the AAC with additional conditions:
1. Pool equipment to be located at least 5 feet from any property line.
2. Guest house shall not be rented as a short term rental separate from the main home. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Approve as recommended by the AAC with additional conditions:
1. Pool equipment to be located at least 5 feet from any property line.
2. Guest house shall not be rented as a short term rental separate from the main home. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
2A. A REQUEST TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION BY PETITION FROM THE LAWRENCE AND MARGUERITE STREET RESIDENTS TO CHANGE THE NAME OF 34TH AVENUE TO SHORE BRIDGE LANE BETWEEN CROSSLEY ROAD EAST TO MARGUERITE STREET (CASE 5.1375 SNC). (FF) (Continued from August 12, 2015 meeting)
Planning Director Fagg provided background information for the proposed street name change and noted that the Lawrence Crossley neighborhood is requesting to continue the item to October 2016.
The Commission commented and/or requested clarification on:
-Taking public testimony was questioned if this item was requested for a continuance out to a year.
-Status of the Vibrante development.
-Initiation of this application to begin the process.
-Public testimony taken at the July 8th Planning Commission meeting.
-The Vibrante project will have 5 - 7 houses that will face on 34th Avenue.
-There are no current properties that have street addresses on 34th Avenue.
Table.
Motion to approve Table. Moved by Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Table. (Approved)
3. NEW BUSINESS:
3A. DAVID ENDRES / DEBBIE REICHLING FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,170-SQUARE FOOT HOUSE ON A HILLSIDE LOT AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR MODIFICATION REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN BUILDING HEIGHT LOCATED AT 2355 NORTH MILO DRIVE, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.2938 MAJ & 7.1456 AMM). (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker provided background information on the proposed hillside lot as outlined in the staff report.
JAMES CIOFFI, architect, indicated they met with the neighbors and addressed issues relating to the height of the house. He addressed the elevation, setback and height; noting that the house is stepped down into the hill. Mr. Cioffi pointed-out the views (pictures) from the adjacent neighbors.
The Commission asked techincal questions pertaining to:
-The height of the adjacent property to the left.
-Were story poles put up?
Commissioner Calerdine noted that the height of the adjacent house appears to very close to the height of this house and this is the best use of land because of the slope.
Motion to approve Approve, as submitted. Moved by Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Calerdine.
Commissioner Roberts said this is a beautiful house; however, in hillside developments views become very important. He is not convinced that this house will not have an effect on the parcel above it. He would like to see a story pole on the center section of the house that rises up to ensure that no significant impact will be made.
Commissioner Weremiuk would like to see a story pole or the height brought down two feet.
Chair Klatchko questioned if staff has heard from the owner of the undeveloped lot that is most affected. He commented that they are the ones most affected and since they do not have an issue he is less concerned.
Commissioner Calerdine recalled that Tuscany Heights had a significant impact of views on Milo Drive to the houses on the west. He think they would like to encourage the use of these type of split-level houses on hillsides because of the cutting and filling. He is happy with the design as it is.
Commissioner Roberts said he is not certain that this house will not have an impact to the house above it until he sees a story pole. He does not want to set a precedence on height impacts.
Commissioner Lowe said that since it's only a 3 ft. wide section (the architectural feature) and not the entire house that is 24 ft. he does not have a concern. He is agreeable to placing story poles on this section. He withdrew his motion.
Commissioner Middleton said she admires the architecture; however, has concern with number of the properties that appear to violate the height limit and does not want to set a precedence.
The Commission discussed the no one is guaranteed a view and the question is to what degree will it affect someone's view.
Motion to approve Continue to October 14, 2015, to allow the applicant to place story poles on the four corner of the 22 feet section. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to October 14, 2015, to allow the applicant to place story poles on the four corner of the 22 feet section. (Approved)
3B. A REPORT ON THE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ISSUED TO JAYDUBYA ENTERTAINMENT, LLC FOR A COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH INDOOR AMPLIFIED MUSIC AT 212 AND 216 S. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, ZONE LSC BY SECTION 14 SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE 5.1320 CUP). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided an update for the existing cocktail lounge as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-The Apparent STC (Sound Transmission Class) the higher number means less sound permeating the wall (a better number).
-DL Acoustic was hired by the applicant for assessment.
-Status of standards for measuring bass levels.
-Has Spurline (adjacent neighbor) contacted staff?
RON BOWDOIN, Chill Bar,
TODD DAVIDSON, Mirage Developers, contract developer, stated that supplemental material was given to staff with the materials that were used for the sound attenuated wall and the acoutistic engineer came in and found that their wall was greater than the required criteria.
DAVID LUBMAN, DL Acoustics, Certified Acoustical Consultant, stated that the rating was STC 50 rating and the required was STC 60. He said there's a chance this could be brought up to compliance and the weakness is not in the bass. He said the real problems are at the higher frequencies and suggested the reasons (bridges) in the sound insulation - it could be a flighty path through ducts (not the wall) which could be fixed inexpensively and bring it to or very close to compliance. He said subject testing was made by setting up the music as loud as it could go in Chill Bar and they could barely hear the must from Chill Bar as loud as they have ever had it. The problem was adjacent bar was almost unoccupied and there was nothing to bring up the ambient noise.
JIM OSTERBERGER, Spurline, said the situation has gotten somewhat better but there is still some bass coming through. He requested a another review in 3 months.
RON BOWDOIN, requested to come back in less than 3 months for review to allow them continue to operate and make the investment decisions they need to make.
Motion to approve To continue to a date certain of November 12, 2015, to allow the sound engineer to file the report and the applicant to continue the work to mitigate the noise issue. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Calerdine.
Vote to approve To continue to a date certain of November 12, 2015, to allow the sound engineer to file the report and the applicant to continue the work to mitigate the noise issue. (Approved)
3C. A & J PALMAS LTD. PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE EXISTING MULTI-TENANT BUILDING LOCATED AT 555 S. PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 / PD-82 (CASE SP 15-002). (DN)
Commissioner Middleton noted a business-related conflict of interest and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. She left the Council Chamber at 2:55 pm.
Associate Planner Newell provided an overview on the proposed sign program as outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Roberts because none of these businesses use the front elevation of the building most people would drive to the back of the building and it seemed to make sense to have the individual names of the businesses on the rear door.
Motion to adopted To return for review of a monument sign to allow tenant visibility on Palm Canyon and only allow signage for the end-unit tenants and in the rear, as recommended by the AAC. Moved by Vice-Chair Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
LARRY DEITZ, Signs by Tomorrow, said that they agree not to have logos on the front only simple font and does not think a monument sign would is not be practical. He indicated that the main entrances are in the rear and the visibility is limited in the front of the building.
Commissioner Roberts expressed concern with sign cluttering on Palm Canyon and messiness of old lettering and preferred a monument sign.
Commissioner Doenenfeld suggested signage to the lower fascia as an alternative to the monument sign which would be less expensive.
Commissioner Roberts concurred with the options as recommended by the AAC and further discussion occurred.
Motion to approve Approve, subject to conditions including the three (3) conditions recommended by the AAC:
1. Limit Palm Canyon signage to lower fascia (dark colored beam), or return with monument sign for Palm Canyon signage.
2. Two end cap tenants be limited to three signs conforming to specs. (maximum 14" letter height along the south side and the
north, east and west signs are limited to the brown fascia to 8" in height.) Moved by Vice-Chair Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Approve, subject to conditions including the three (3) conditions recommended by the AAC:
1. Limit Palm Canyon signage to lower fascia (dark colored beam), or return with monument sign for Palm Canyon signage.
2. Two end cap tenants be limited to three signs conforming to specs. (maximum 14" letter height along the south side and the
north, east and west signs are limited to the brown fascia to 8" in height.) (Approved)
Commissioner Middleton re-entered the Council Chamber at 3:22 pm.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-Status of new hotel for the downtown project.
-The Musuem Market Plaza Specific Plan update will be held at a study session on October 14th.
-Subcommittee updates.
-Project requests for 3D models.
-City land sales and reclaiming property.
-One Palm Springs will be hosting Candidates Forum on the water issues for the water board candidates.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 3:29 to Wednesday, October 14, 2015, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Sep 24, 2015 Planning Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Klatchko called the meeting to order at 1:31 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 7 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
Staff Liaisons:
Flinn Fagg, AICP, Director of Planning Services
Michael Daudt, City Attorney
Terri Hintz, Planning Administrative Coordinator
Savat Khamphou, Assistant Director of Public Works
Glenn Mlaker, AICP, Assistant Planner
David Newell, Associate Planner
Edward Robertson, Principal Planner
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 6:00 pm on Thursday, September 17, 2015.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Commissioner Middleton requested Item 1C pulled from Consent Calender for separate discussion.
Commissioner Weremiuk noted her abstention on minutes of August 12, 2015.
Commissioner Calerdine requested Item 1B pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion.
Director Fagg provided an update on the request that was received to continue Item 2A and recommended the item be heard.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chair Klatchko opened public comments:
-CURT CLINE, spoke in support of Item 1B.
-RON BOWDOIN, representing Chill Bar, Item 3B, indicated that the sound engineer is available for questions on this matter.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: AUGUST 12, 2015
Motion to approve Approve the Minutes of August 12, 2015. Moved by Commissioner Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Approve the Minutes of August 12, 2015. (Approved)
1B. CURT AND ATSUKO CLINE FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,280-SQUARE FOOT HOUSE ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE LOCATED AT 114 WEST SAN MARCO WAY, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.3885 MAJ). (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker provided an overview of the proposed construction house on a major thoroughfare.
Commissioner Calerdine requested more information on the landscaping on the west and north side.
Commissioner Roberts said the house is beautiful and is an excellent use of this small parcel good.
Motion to approve Approve as submitted with conditions. Moved by Commissioner Calerdine, seconded by Commissioner Weremiuk.
Vote to approve Approve as submitted with conditions. (Approved)
1C. JAVIER MORENO REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION BY TO CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,427-SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A 19,395-SQUARE FOOT PARCEL ALONG A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AT 2580 NORTH SUNRISE WAY, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.3903-MAJ). (ER)
Commissioner Middleton said it's an excellent use of the property; however, questioned the location of the pool equipment near the property line on the northeast corner.
Staff responded that they will work with the applicant to see if the pool equipment can be relocated.
Commissioner Middleton requested the guest house cannot be used as a short term rental, separate from the full home.
Commissioner Weremiuk suggested looking at imposing a requirement that pool equipment be located five feet from the property line.
Motion to approve Approve as recommended by the AAC with additional conditions:
1. Pool equipment to be located at least 5 feet from any property line.
2. Guest house shall not be rented as a short term rental separate from the main home. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Approve as recommended by the AAC with additional conditions:
1. Pool equipment to be located at least 5 feet from any property line.
2. Guest house shall not be rented as a short term rental separate from the main home. (Approved)
2. PUBLIC HEARING:
2A. A REQUEST TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION BY PETITION FROM THE LAWRENCE AND MARGUERITE STREET RESIDENTS TO CHANGE THE NAME OF 34TH AVENUE TO SHORE BRIDGE LANE BETWEEN CROSSLEY ROAD EAST TO MARGUERITE STREET (CASE 5.1375 SNC). (FF) (Continued from August 12, 2015 meeting)
Planning Director Fagg provided background information for the proposed street name change and noted that the Lawrence Crossley neighborhood is requesting to continue the item to October 2016.
The Commission commented and/or requested clarification on:
-Taking public testimony was questioned if this item was requested for a continuance out to a year.
-Status of the Vibrante development.
-Initiation of this application to begin the process.
-Public testimony taken at the July 8th Planning Commission meeting.
-The Vibrante project will have 5 - 7 houses that will face on 34th Avenue.
-There are no current properties that have street addresses on 34th Avenue.
Table.
Motion to approve Table. Moved by Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Table. (Approved)
3. NEW BUSINESS:
3A. DAVID ENDRES / DEBBIE REICHLING FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,170-SQUARE FOOT HOUSE ON A HILLSIDE LOT AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE MINOR MODIFICATION REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN BUILDING HEIGHT LOCATED AT 2355 NORTH MILO DRIVE, ZONE R-1-C (CASE 3.2938 MAJ & 7.1456 AMM). (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker provided background information on the proposed hillside lot as outlined in the staff report.
JAMES CIOFFI, architect, indicated they met with the neighbors and addressed issues relating to the height of the house. He addressed the elevation, setback and height; noting that the house is stepped down into the hill. Mr. Cioffi pointed-out the views (pictures) from the adjacent neighbors.
The Commission asked techincal questions pertaining to:
-The height of the adjacent property to the left.
-Were story poles put up?
Commissioner Calerdine noted that the height of the adjacent house appears to very close to the height of this house and this is the best use of land because of the slope.
Motion to approve Approve, as submitted. Moved by Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Calerdine.
Commissioner Roberts said this is a beautiful house; however, in hillside developments views become very important. He is not convinced that this house will not have an effect on the parcel above it. He would like to see a story pole on the center section of the house that rises up to ensure that no significant impact will be made.
Commissioner Weremiuk would like to see a story pole or the height brought down two feet.
Chair Klatchko questioned if staff has heard from the owner of the undeveloped lot that is most affected. He commented that they are the ones most affected and since they do not have an issue he is less concerned.
Commissioner Calerdine recalled that Tuscany Heights had a significant impact of views on Milo Drive to the houses on the west. He think they would like to encourage the use of these type of split-level houses on hillsides because of the cutting and filling. He is happy with the design as it is.
Commissioner Roberts said he is not certain that this house will not have an impact to the house above it until he sees a story pole. He does not want to set a precedence on height impacts.
Commissioner Lowe said that since it's only a 3 ft. wide section (the architectural feature) and not the entire house that is 24 ft. he does not have a concern. He is agreeable to placing story poles on this section. He withdrew his motion.
Commissioner Middleton said she admires the architecture; however, has concern with number of the properties that appear to violate the height limit and does not want to set a precedence.
The Commission discussed the no one is guaranteed a view and the question is to what degree will it affect someone's view.
Motion to approve Continue to October 14, 2015, to allow the applicant to place story poles on the four corner of the 22 feet section. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approve Continue to October 14, 2015, to allow the applicant to place story poles on the four corner of the 22 feet section. (Approved)
3B. A REPORT ON THE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ISSUED TO JAYDUBYA ENTERTAINMENT, LLC FOR A COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH INDOOR AMPLIFIED MUSIC AT 212 AND 216 S. INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, ZONE LSC BY SECTION 14 SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE 5.1320 CUP). (DN)
Associate Planner Newell provided an update for the existing cocktail lounge as outlined in the staff report.
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-The Apparent STC (Sound Transmission Class) the higher number means less sound permeating the wall (a better number).
-DL Acoustic was hired by the applicant for assessment.
-Status of standards for measuring bass levels.
-Has Spurline (adjacent neighbor) contacted staff?
RON BOWDOIN, Chill Bar,
TODD DAVIDSON, Mirage Developers, contract developer, stated that supplemental material was given to staff with the materials that were used for the sound attenuated wall and the acoutistic engineer came in and found that their wall was greater than the required criteria.
DAVID LUBMAN, DL Acoustics, Certified Acoustical Consultant, stated that the rating was STC 50 rating and the required was STC 60. He said there's a chance this could be brought up to compliance and the weakness is not in the bass. He said the real problems are at the higher frequencies and suggested the reasons (bridges) in the sound insulation - it could be a flighty path through ducts (not the wall) which could be fixed inexpensively and bring it to or very close to compliance. He said subject testing was made by setting up the music as loud as it could go in Chill Bar and they could barely hear the must from Chill Bar as loud as they have ever had it. The problem was adjacent bar was almost unoccupied and there was nothing to bring up the ambient noise.
JIM OSTERBERGER, Spurline, said the situation has gotten somewhat better but there is still some bass coming through. He requested a another review in 3 months.
RON BOWDOIN, requested to come back in less than 3 months for review to allow them continue to operate and make the investment decisions they need to make.
Motion to approve To continue to a date certain of November 12, 2015, to allow the sound engineer to file the report and the applicant to continue the work to mitigate the noise issue. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Calerdine.
Vote to approve To continue to a date certain of November 12, 2015, to allow the sound engineer to file the report and the applicant to continue the work to mitigate the noise issue. (Approved)
3C. A & J PALMAS LTD. PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE EXISTING MULTI-TENANT BUILDING LOCATED AT 555 S. PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE C-1 / PD-82 (CASE SP 15-002). (DN)
Commissioner Middleton noted a business-related conflict of interest and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. She left the Council Chamber at 2:55 pm.
Associate Planner Newell provided an overview on the proposed sign program as outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Roberts because none of these businesses use the front elevation of the building most people would drive to the back of the building and it seemed to make sense to have the individual names of the businesses on the rear door.
Motion to adopted To return for review of a monument sign to allow tenant visibility on Palm Canyon and only allow signage for the end-unit tenants and in the rear, as recommended by the AAC. Moved by Vice-Chair Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
LARRY DEITZ, Signs by Tomorrow, said that they agree not to have logos on the front only simple font and does not think a monument sign would is not be practical. He indicated that the main entrances are in the rear and the visibility is limited in the front of the building.
Commissioner Roberts expressed concern with sign cluttering on Palm Canyon and messiness of old lettering and preferred a monument sign.
Commissioner Doenenfeld suggested signage to the lower fascia as an alternative to the monument sign which would be less expensive.
Commissioner Roberts concurred with the options as recommended by the AAC and further discussion occurred.
Motion to approve Approve, subject to conditions including the three (3) conditions recommended by the AAC:
1. Limit Palm Canyon signage to lower fascia (dark colored beam), or return with monument sign for Palm Canyon signage.
2. Two end cap tenants be limited to three signs conforming to specs. (maximum 14" letter height along the south side and the
north, east and west signs are limited to the brown fascia to 8" in height.) Moved by Vice-Chair Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Donenfeld.
Vote to approve Approve, subject to conditions including the three (3) conditions recommended by the AAC:
1. Limit Palm Canyon signage to lower fascia (dark colored beam), or return with monument sign for Palm Canyon signage.
2. Two end cap tenants be limited to three signs conforming to specs. (maximum 14" letter height along the south side and the
north, east and west signs are limited to the brown fascia to 8" in height.) (Approved)
Commissioner Middleton re-entered the Council Chamber at 3:22 pm.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-Status of new hotel for the downtown project.
-The Musuem Market Plaza Specific Plan update will be held at a study session on October 14th.
-Subcommittee updates.
-Project requests for 3D models.
-City land sales and reclaiming property.
-One Palm Springs will be hosting Candidates Forum on the water issues for the water board candidates.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 3:29 to Wednesday, October 14, 2015, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://palmspringsca.new.swagit.com/videos/15056/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item
