The agenda was posted for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 4:00 pm on Thursday, March 5, 2015.

1B. A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION BY DENLAR LLC FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A HILLSIDE LOT LOCATED AT 2110 NORTH LEONARD (ZONE R-1-B) (Case 3.3817 MAJ). (KL)

Associate Planner Lyon presented the proposed project as outlined in the staff report.

Technical Questions:

Commissioner Weremiuk asked if the solar rights act (letter distributed) would prevent shading of the on-site solar panels.

MICHAEL DAUDT, legal representation for the City, responded that he would need to review the law in relation to the proposed project.

Commissioner Calerdine requested a technical analysis to see if there is a shading issue.

Dennis Freeman, Denlar, LLC, said they considered the location of the neighbor's solar panels. Mr. Freeman said that there are no sidewalks or gutter in the entire neighborhood and noted concern with several of the engineering conditions.

Commissioner Roberts suggested to the neighbor to provide a shade study to assist in seeing if there is an issue.

Motion to approved Continue to a date certain of March 25, 2015, and direct staff and the applicant to work together to resolve the following issues:

1. A legal analysis of the solar rights act as it relates to the neighbor's solar panels and a technical study in reference to
shading.
2. Allow the applicant to work Engineering and Planning staff to resolve engineering conditions in question. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Calerdine.

Vote to approved Continue to a date certain of March 25, 2015, and direct staff and the applicant to work together to resolve the following issues:

1. A legal analysis of the solar rights act as it relates to the neighbor's solar panels and a technical study in reference to
shading.
2. Allow the applicant to work Engineering and Planning staff to resolve engineering conditions in question. (Approved)

2A. SERGE DOROSHIN'S REQUEST FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT APPLICATION (PDD 376); A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 36815) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, AND A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 32-UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AND TWO LIVE WORK UNITS LOCATED AT 262 SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, ZONE LSC, SECTION 14; (CASE 5.1358-PDD 376 / TTM 36815 & 3.3788-MAJ). (ER)

Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed project as outlined in the staff report noting that this site is located in the Section 14 area and the additional height is allowed.

Chair Hudson disclosed that he met with the architectural designer on this project.

Technical Questions:

Commissioner Weremiuk commented or requested clarification on:

1. Does this project meet the Section 14 Design Guidelines? (It does meet the design guidelines; however, it does not meet the requirement for open-space for which relief is sought in the PD.)
2. Are the pools on a zero lot-line?
3. Parking for commercial trucks.

Chair Hudson opened the public hearing:

-CHRIS PARDO, Chris Pardo Design, spoke about this being a difficult project site (limited access) and noted that the project is gated so that it would not become a thoroughfare and prohibit parking . He commented that the two front live/work units are not required to have bathrooms and provided details in reference to the ADA parking spaces, pedestrian gates, height and materials.

There being no further speakers the public hearing was closed.

The Commission questioned and/or commented on:

1. Bathroom plumbing for the commercial space in the live/work units.
2. Open pedestrian gates would make it friendlier.
3. Guest parking.

Chair Hudson noted the vehicular access from Calle Encilia is appropriate; however, the pedestrian entry and the Indian Canyon elevation need more articulation in the landscape and hardscape. He said the canvas elements will be very critical in creating a communal space and the groundscape could benefit from more articulation and suggested looking at different paving patterns. He would like to see more sun shading and protection for the windows.

Commissioner Middleton said she did not see a shade study and noted that the landscaping would be a challenge; there will be several months with very little sunlight on the north and south side and is not sure this plant material will work.

Commissioner Roberts expressed concern with shading issues on the commercial areas and suggested considering an encroachment to make it stand out.