Video index
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Hudson called the meeting to order at 1:33 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 5 members present, 2 members absent, 0 members excused.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Chair Hudson reported that staff has requested Item 1A pulled from the agenda.
The agenda was accepted.
CHAIR HUDSON said they would like to see this project come back with changes.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 4:00 pm on Thursday, September 4, 2014. A posting of this Agenda can be found on the City's website at: www.palmspringsca.gov.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
TRAE DANIEL, spoke about an upcoming project on 34th Avenue; he encouraged the Commission to come out to the neighborhood.
FRANK TYSEN, spoke in reference to Item 2B and 2C, expressed concern that these projects were not listed as public hearings to allow for public input. He urged the Commission promote diversity and maintain the electic character of the city.
JOHN DAW, interim general manager, Hyatt Hotel, spoke in support of the downtown redevelopment project.
RICHARD CLIFFORD, spoke in support of the downtown redevelopment project; it will be a welcomed addtion and revive the economy.
JAIME KOWAL, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; great architecture and with mountain views.
JORDAN FIFE, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; it will draw many opportunities to the City.
ANDY CARPIAE, Hard Rock Hotel, owner, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; it will be a great asset to the City.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
Continue and direct staff to advise the applicant to revise: 1. 2. Add'l material in the parking structure 3. engineering dept. where they are with angled parking on Indian Cyn. 4. The soundproof from mechanical units 5. More materials on the exterior; 6. Enlarge street levels. 7. Visuals to provide a better rendering on Palm Canyon.
1. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1A. CONT'D - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM SMALL HOTEL TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; LOCATED WEST OF BELARDO ROAD, NORTH OF BARISTO ROAD, EAST OF LUGO ROAD AND SOUTH OF ARENAS ROAD; AND SOUTHWEST OF TAHQUITZ DRIVE AND CAHUILLA ROAD (CASE 5.1322 GPA). (DN)
Removed from the agenda.
1B. PORTABLE OPEN SIGNS - AN AMENDMENT TO THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF WHERE
PORTABLE "OPEN" SIGNS IN FRONT OF COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES ARE ALLOWED TO THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE FROM RAMON ROAD TO ALEJO ROAD, (PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE SECTION 93.20.09.B.5.) (CASE 5.1202 ZTA). (ER)
Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed zone text amendment to expand the boundaries of where the portable open signs are allowed.
Chair Hudson opened the public hearing and with no appearances coming forward the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Weremiuk spoke in support; noting that the east side is the area that needs the most help.
Motion to approved To approve and recommend approval to the City Council. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approved To approve and recommend approval to the City Council. (Approved)
2. NEW BUSINESS:
2A. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FOR A FINAL PDD PLANS APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150-ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-324). (ER)
Staff requested a short break to set-up the presentation.
A recess was taken at 1:54 pm. The meeting resumed at 2:07 pm.
Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed project as outlined in the staff report.
LAWRENCE RAEL, applicant, introduced himself and provided details about the project.
JOSEPH SMART, SMS Architects, project architect, presented the project using a power point presentation pertaining to the site plan, hotel entry, parking garage, view corridors and the 3rd level breaking down the scale of the project. He addressed the architecture, elevations on Palm Canyon, shade studies, hotel entrance, Indian Canyon and Alejo frontage, parking structure, sketches of the spa pool, view corridor entries to the units and materials.
RON GREGORY, described the hardscape design, fountain elements on the center of outer court, plant materials will be selected for its appropriateness for the desert location, Alejo Road landscape view, neandering walkway and landscape lighting.
Chair Hudson and Commissioner Klatchko requested staff provided everything the applicant submits for their review.
The Commission commented on:
-The north side on Alejo Road and Palm Canyon looks stark;
-The angled parking on Indian Canyon; this be a potential problem for stacking;
-The transition road with exit road on Alejo Road; it will impact the traffic patterns on both streets;
-
LAWRENCE RAEL clarified that a median on Alejo Road has been conditioned for the project.
The Commission asked further questions and/or commented on:
-Shade studies around the corner;
-Angeled parking on Indian Canyon could be a traffic hazard; project is over-parked.
-Eliminate parking spaces on Indian Canyon and provide additional pedestrian and landscape space.
-Angeled parking may need further study.
-Concerned about stark architecture and uncertain about angeled parking.
-Good to see the 3D models; impressed with architecture and landscaping palette.
-
Chair Hudson expressed the following comments:
1. Building is very simple; a true example of minimalist architecture.
2. Miminalmism demands fine detailing with a sensitivity to materials and scale.
3. Materials are stark.
4. Pedestrian connections from the grade level parking structure to adjacent streets; needs to be wider.
5. Indian Canyon and Alejo Road need a pedestrian sidewalk.
6. No elevations of the south side of the project; would like to see more material of the south fascade.
7. Additional 3D drawings from close up and far away.
8. The gap between buildings; aesthecially and functionality.
9. Pedestrian experience in the middle of the summer.
10. The hotel platform has an area that needs to be paved; a very stark area.
11. The pedestrian connection between the hotel drop off area and Indian Canyon the drawings do not show the 5 foot drop.
12. Elements are very thin.
The development team addressed the Commission's questions.
Motion to approved To continue and direct staff to
1. Provide new 3D exhibits for the south side of the building and podiums.
2. Provide additional details for the parking structure; what the experience will on the pedestrian access to Palm Canyon and walkway around the parking
structure with an exit onto Alejo Road and Indian Canyon.
3. The angled parking and two way streets on Indian Canyon from the Engineering Dept.
4. How will it be soundproof for the neighbors in the mechanical area against the neighbors; the gap.
5. More details on the materials for the exterior of the building; including the screening. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Vice-Chair Klatchko.
Vote to approved To continue and direct staff to
1. Provide new 3D exhibits for the south side of the building and podiums.
2. Provide additional details for the parking structure; what the experience will on the pedestrian access to Palm Canyon and walkway around the parking
structure with an exit onto Alejo Road and Indian Canyon.
3. The angled parking and two way streets on Indian Canyon from the Engineering Dept.
4. How will it be soundproof for the neighbors in the mechanical area against the neighbors; the gap.
5. More details on the materials for the exterior of the building; including the screening. (Approved)
A break was taken at 3:36 pm.
The meeting resumed at 3:57 pm.
2B. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR AN UPDATE ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF BLOCK A OF THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS RENOVATION PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ANDREAS ROAD AND PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD (CASE 3.3605 MAJ). (DN)
2C. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR A REVISED ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON BLOCK B OF THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS RENOVATION PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ANDREAS ROAD AND PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD (CASE 3.3606 MAJ). (DN)
Interim Director Evans provided background information for Building A. Mr. Evans reported that Building B is the middle building that is fully approved as a single-story building with the exception of bringing back architectural details for the Commission. He stated that the applicant has submitted revised drawings, a new two-story building and an alternate proposal for this site.
Associate Planner Newell presented the proposed projects as outlined in the staff report.
CHAIR HUDSON opened the public comment portion of the meeting:
JOHN WESSMAN, applicant, explained the overall project and open-space; He requested the opportunity to provide an alternate plan for Buildings A & B and does not want to give up approvals he already has. He has worked very hard to move this project forward and has signed leases with major tenants with large penalties if project is delayed.
CHRIS PARDO, Chris Pardo Design, provided an overview of Block A and the new proposed Block B. He said the landscape is a concept in general. Mr. Pardo described the proposed new walkways, railings, the element fins, materials, building height, sun shade study, balcony railings and plantar features.
With no other appearances coming forward public comments was closed.
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-The location of the fin element for Building A seems to divide the the building in half; suggested moving it closer to the end of the building.
-The connection between A & B is very solid; however, the connection between B & C looks heavy with lighter architecture.
JOHN WESSMAN commented that whole idea from the beginning is these buildings would be built at different times and not look all the same. It is downtown and not a mall; does not have a problem moving the fin by one bay.
COMMISSIONER MIDDLETON said that although the process has been very difficult progress has been made. She noted that she was unimpressed with the original Building B; the new roof lines draw Block A and C together. She commented on a minor concern with the alleyway between the Hyatt hotel and Block A; with some shading and not a significant change.
JOHN WESSMAN clarified that this landscaping and have given the Hyatt an easement to incorporate into the project. The Hyatt will bring it for approval. Mr. Wessman clarified that the landscaping will be submitted at a later time to the Commission.
Motion to approved Determine that the revised exterior elevations fulfill Condition of Approval No. 10 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6412, as amended:
-The fin be moved one bay to the north and the panel is expanded one additional bay. Moved by Vice-Chair Klatchko, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approved Determine that the revised exterior elevations fulfill Condition of Approval No. 10 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6412, as amended:
-The fin be moved one bay to the north and the panel is expanded one additional bay. (Approved)
Motion to approved Approve Bock B, as presented with the condition that the obscured glass is not backlit. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approved Approve Bock B, as presented with the condition that the obscured glass is not backlit. (Approved)
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
Vice-Chair Klatchko thanked Mr. Evans for his assistance during the interim period.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Interim Director Evans provided background information on the original intent of a final Planned Development District for architecture.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 5:09 pm to Wednesday, September 24, 2014, at 1:30 pm, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Sep 10, 2014 Planning Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Hudson called the meeting to order at 1:33 pm.
ROLL CALL:
Roll Call: 5 members present, 2 members absent, 0 members excused.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
Chair Hudson reported that staff has requested Item 1A pulled from the agenda.
The agenda was accepted.
CHAIR HUDSON said they would like to see this project come back with changes.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 4:00 pm on Thursday, September 4, 2014. A posting of this Agenda can be found on the City's website at: www.palmspringsca.gov.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
TRAE DANIEL, spoke about an upcoming project on 34th Avenue; he encouraged the Commission to come out to the neighborhood.
FRANK TYSEN, spoke in reference to Item 2B and 2C, expressed concern that these projects were not listed as public hearings to allow for public input. He urged the Commission promote diversity and maintain the electic character of the city.
JOHN DAW, interim general manager, Hyatt Hotel, spoke in support of the downtown redevelopment project.
RICHARD CLIFFORD, spoke in support of the downtown redevelopment project; it will be a welcomed addtion and revive the economy.
JAIME KOWAL, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; great architecture and with mountain views.
JORDAN FIFE, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; it will draw many opportunities to the City.
ANDY CARPIAE, Hard Rock Hotel, owner, spoke in favor of the downtown revitalization project; it will be a great asset to the City.
There being no further appearances public comments was closed.
Continue and direct staff to advise the applicant to revise: 1. 2. Add'l material in the parking structure 3. engineering dept. where they are with angled parking on Indian Cyn. 4. The soundproof from mechanical units 5. More materials on the exterior; 6. Enlarge street levels. 7. Visuals to provide a better rendering on Palm Canyon.
1. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1A. CONT'D - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM SMALL HOTEL TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT; LOCATED WEST OF BELARDO ROAD, NORTH OF BARISTO ROAD, EAST OF LUGO ROAD AND SOUTH OF ARENAS ROAD; AND SOUTHWEST OF TAHQUITZ DRIVE AND CAHUILLA ROAD (CASE 5.1322 GPA). (DN)
Removed from the agenda.
1B. PORTABLE OPEN SIGNS - AN AMENDMENT TO THE PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF WHERE
PORTABLE "OPEN" SIGNS IN FRONT OF COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES ARE ALLOWED TO THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE FROM RAMON ROAD TO ALEJO ROAD, (PALM SPRINGS ZONING CODE SECTION 93.20.09.B.5.) (CASE 5.1202 ZTA). (ER)
Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed zone text amendment to expand the boundaries of where the portable open signs are allowed.
Chair Hudson opened the public hearing and with no appearances coming forward the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Weremiuk spoke in support; noting that the east side is the area that needs the most help.
Motion to approved To approve and recommend approval to the City Council. Moved by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approved To approve and recommend approval to the City Council. (Approved)
2. NEW BUSINESS:
2A. PALM SPRINGS, LLC, REQUEST FOR A FINAL PDD PLANS APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 324 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF A 150-ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 400 NORTH PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE PD324, (5.1091-PD-324). (ER)
Staff requested a short break to set-up the presentation.
A recess was taken at 1:54 pm. The meeting resumed at 2:07 pm.
Principal Planner Robertson presented the proposed project as outlined in the staff report.
LAWRENCE RAEL, applicant, introduced himself and provided details about the project.
JOSEPH SMART, SMS Architects, project architect, presented the project using a power point presentation pertaining to the site plan, hotel entry, parking garage, view corridors and the 3rd level breaking down the scale of the project. He addressed the architecture, elevations on Palm Canyon, shade studies, hotel entrance, Indian Canyon and Alejo frontage, parking structure, sketches of the spa pool, view corridor entries to the units and materials.
RON GREGORY, described the hardscape design, fountain elements on the center of outer court, plant materials will be selected for its appropriateness for the desert location, Alejo Road landscape view, neandering walkway and landscape lighting.
Chair Hudson and Commissioner Klatchko requested staff provided everything the applicant submits for their review.
The Commission commented on:
-The north side on Alejo Road and Palm Canyon looks stark;
-The angled parking on Indian Canyon; this be a potential problem for stacking;
-The transition road with exit road on Alejo Road; it will impact the traffic patterns on both streets;
-
LAWRENCE RAEL clarified that a median on Alejo Road has been conditioned for the project.
The Commission asked further questions and/or commented on:
-Shade studies around the corner;
-Angeled parking on Indian Canyon could be a traffic hazard; project is over-parked.
-Eliminate parking spaces on Indian Canyon and provide additional pedestrian and landscape space.
-Angeled parking may need further study.
-Concerned about stark architecture and uncertain about angeled parking.
-Good to see the 3D models; impressed with architecture and landscaping palette.
-
Chair Hudson expressed the following comments:
1. Building is very simple; a true example of minimalist architecture.
2. Miminalmism demands fine detailing with a sensitivity to materials and scale.
3. Materials are stark.
4. Pedestrian connections from the grade level parking structure to adjacent streets; needs to be wider.
5. Indian Canyon and Alejo Road need a pedestrian sidewalk.
6. No elevations of the south side of the project; would like to see more material of the south fascade.
7. Additional 3D drawings from close up and far away.
8. The gap between buildings; aesthecially and functionality.
9. Pedestrian experience in the middle of the summer.
10. The hotel platform has an area that needs to be paved; a very stark area.
11. The pedestrian connection between the hotel drop off area and Indian Canyon the drawings do not show the 5 foot drop.
12. Elements are very thin.
The development team addressed the Commission's questions.
Motion to approved To continue and direct staff to
1. Provide new 3D exhibits for the south side of the building and podiums.
2. Provide additional details for the parking structure; what the experience will on the pedestrian access to Palm Canyon and walkway around the parking
structure with an exit onto Alejo Road and Indian Canyon.
3. The angled parking and two way streets on Indian Canyon from the Engineering Dept.
4. How will it be soundproof for the neighbors in the mechanical area against the neighbors; the gap.
5. More details on the materials for the exterior of the building; including the screening. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Vice-Chair Klatchko.
Vote to approved To continue and direct staff to
1. Provide new 3D exhibits for the south side of the building and podiums.
2. Provide additional details for the parking structure; what the experience will on the pedestrian access to Palm Canyon and walkway around the parking
structure with an exit onto Alejo Road and Indian Canyon.
3. The angled parking and two way streets on Indian Canyon from the Engineering Dept.
4. How will it be soundproof for the neighbors in the mechanical area against the neighbors; the gap.
5. More details on the materials for the exterior of the building; including the screening. (Approved)
A break was taken at 3:36 pm.
The meeting resumed at 3:57 pm.
2B. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR AN UPDATE ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF BLOCK A OF THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS RENOVATION PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ANDREAS ROAD AND PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD (CASE 3.3605 MAJ). (DN)
2C. PALM SPRINGS PROMENADE, LLC FOR A REVISED ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON BLOCK B OF THE DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS RENOVATION PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ANDREAS ROAD AND PALM CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD (CASE 3.3606 MAJ). (DN)
Interim Director Evans provided background information for Building A. Mr. Evans reported that Building B is the middle building that is fully approved as a single-story building with the exception of bringing back architectural details for the Commission. He stated that the applicant has submitted revised drawings, a new two-story building and an alternate proposal for this site.
Associate Planner Newell presented the proposed projects as outlined in the staff report.
CHAIR HUDSON opened the public comment portion of the meeting:
JOHN WESSMAN, applicant, explained the overall project and open-space; He requested the opportunity to provide an alternate plan for Buildings A & B and does not want to give up approvals he already has. He has worked very hard to move this project forward and has signed leases with major tenants with large penalties if project is delayed.
CHRIS PARDO, Chris Pardo Design, provided an overview of Block A and the new proposed Block B. He said the landscape is a concept in general. Mr. Pardo described the proposed new walkways, railings, the element fins, materials, building height, sun shade study, balcony railings and plantar features.
With no other appearances coming forward public comments was closed.
The Commission requested clarification and/or commented on:
-The location of the fin element for Building A seems to divide the the building in half; suggested moving it closer to the end of the building.
-The connection between A & B is very solid; however, the connection between B & C looks heavy with lighter architecture.
JOHN WESSMAN commented that whole idea from the beginning is these buildings would be built at different times and not look all the same. It is downtown and not a mall; does not have a problem moving the fin by one bay.
COMMISSIONER MIDDLETON said that although the process has been very difficult progress has been made. She noted that she was unimpressed with the original Building B; the new roof lines draw Block A and C together. She commented on a minor concern with the alleyway between the Hyatt hotel and Block A; with some shading and not a significant change.
JOHN WESSMAN clarified that this landscaping and have given the Hyatt an easement to incorporate into the project. The Hyatt will bring it for approval. Mr. Wessman clarified that the landscaping will be submitted at a later time to the Commission.
Motion to approved Determine that the revised exterior elevations fulfill Condition of Approval No. 10 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6412, as amended:
-The fin be moved one bay to the north and the panel is expanded one additional bay. Moved by Vice-Chair Klatchko, seconded by Commissioner Lowe.
Vote to approved Determine that the revised exterior elevations fulfill Condition of Approval No. 10 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6412, as amended:
-The fin be moved one bay to the north and the panel is expanded one additional bay. (Approved)
Motion to approved Approve Bock B, as presented with the condition that the obscured glass is not backlit. Moved by Commissioner Weremiuk, seconded by Commissioner Middleton.
Vote to approved Approve Bock B, as presented with the condition that the obscured glass is not backlit. (Approved)
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS AND COMMENTS:
Vice-Chair Klatchko thanked Mr. Evans for his assistance during the interim period.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Interim Director Evans provided background information on the original intent of a final Planned Development District for architecture.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned at 5:09 pm to Wednesday, September 24, 2014, at 1:30 pm, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://palmspringsca.new.swagit.com/videos/15029/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item
