Video index
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 1:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, September 21, 2007.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted, as presented.
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit.)
Chair Marantz opened Public Comments:
-Arlene Battishill, Palm Springs, spoke in reference to Item 5 (Boulders) and 6 (Crescendo); voiced concern with insufficient soil analysis and requested further studies.
-Mario Berardi, applicant for Item 4, requested consideration to defer the utility undergrounding to covenant due to a financial burden.
There being no further comments, Public Comments was closed.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Chair Marantz requested staff address Item 2 pertaining to the site which is covered with overgrown shrubbery. Staff responded this concern will be forwarded to Code Enforcement.
Motion to To approve, Items 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D, as part of the Consent Calendar. Moved by Hutcheson, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To approve, Items 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D, as part of the Consent Calendar. (Approved)
2A. Case 3.2402 MAJ - A request by Kent Salveson for a one-year
time extension to construct an eight-unit apartment located at
199 Via Olivera, Zone R-2, Section 3, APN: 504-270-004.
(Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2B. Case TPM 31351 (Indian Oasis) - A request by Margaret Parks of
the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians for a one-year time
extension for a mixed-use development consisting of
retail/office/industrial space, a 700-room luxury resort hotel and an
18-hole golf course on 273 acres located at the southwest corner
of Crossley Road and Mesquite Avenue, Zone M-1-P, Section 20,
APNs: 680-180-043, 45 and 046. (Project Planner: Bryan
Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2C. Case 5.1051 CUP - A request by Jay Jarquin of Avalon Pain
Solutions Inc., for a one-year time extension to operate an
intermediate care facility for patients with chronic pain located at
855 North Indian Canyon Drive and 175 East El Alameda, Zone R-3,
Section 10, APNs: 505-285-011 and 012. (Project Planner: Bryan
Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2D. Case 3.3110 SFR - An application by Rick Christie, owner, to
construct a 3,918 square foot single-family residence on a hillside
lot located at 1577 Rose Avenue, Zone R-1-C, Section 1, APN:
505-044-014. (Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant
Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
MISCELLANEOUS:
3. Case 5.1038 AMND PD 310 (Tangerine) - A request by Via Escuela
Land Partners, LLC., for a use and standards amendment to
Planned Development District 310 to permit installation of a
controlled entry gate and turn-around located at 217 Via Escuela,
Zone PD 310 (C-1), Section 3, APN: 504-310-036. (Project
Planner: Chris Brown, Contract Planner)
Commissioner Hutcheson stated his abstention on Item 3 and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. He left the Council Chamber at 1:44 p.m. Vice Chair Hochanadel noted his abstention and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. He left the Council Chamber at 1:44 p.m.
Chris Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
-Skip Goodell, architect, stated the guest entrance has been widened to 18 feet and the landscaping has been enhanced. Mr. Goodell requested approval of the entry gate for the safety of the homeowners.
-Mark Dupont, applicant, provided further details and emphasized the widening of the entry gate.
-Charles Sachs, Palm Springs, voiced concern with a potential road hazard at the nearby intersection due to traffic slowing down at the entry gate.
Commissioner Caffery entered the Council Chamber at 1:54 p.m.
Scott Ventura, Fire Division Chief, provided further details and indicated that a fire engine would be 11 feet in the right-of-way with the proposed entry gate and recommended a 24-hour man-gated entrance or no gate entry.
Commissioner Scott noted he is opposed to this request based on engineering and fire safety concerns.
Motion to To deny the applicant’s request. Moved by Scott, seconded by Ringlein.
Vote to To deny the applicant’s request. (Approved)
Commissioner Hutcheson and Vice Chair Hochanadel re-entered the Council Chamber at 2:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. Case 3.3033 and 3.3034 MAJ AMND - A request by Mario Berardi to change
previously approved Conditions of Approval to defer obligations to perform
utility undergrounding for a project comprised of two warehouse buildings
located at 245 and 265 Radio Road, Zone M-1, Section 34, APNs: 669-444-
002 and 003. (Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Chair Marantz stated a business related conflict of interest and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. She left the Council Chamber at 2:01 p.m.
Christopher Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Marcus Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works, provided further details on the two previously approved buildings requiring undergrounding of utilities.
The Commission discussed the power poles on the adjacent properties and the estimate of the cost given by Edison of $160,000.00 for the cost to under ground the utilities.
Mario Berardi, applicant, provided further details and stated that the power pole to the west, on the adjacent property, should have been under grounded.
Motion to To approve, the applicant's request to defer utility undergrounding to covenant. Moved by Hutcheson, seconded by Caffery.
Vote to To approve, the applicant's request to defer utility undergrounding to covenant. (Approved)
Commissioner Ringlein requested utility undergrounding as a discussion item for a study session.
Chair Marantz re-entered the Council Chamber at 2:13 p.m.
5. Case 5.0973 PD 287 / TTM 31095 (Boulders) - Planned
Development District 287 and Tentative Tract Map 31095 for the
subdivision of approximately 30.4-acre parcel into 45 lots. The
Planned Development District would allow new design and
development standards for a proposed development of up to 45
single-family residential units located at 751 West Via Escuela,
Zone R-1-A, Section 3, APN’s: 504-150-002 and 009. (Project
Planner: Edward O. Robertson, Principal Planner) (continued from
September 12, 2007)
6. Case 5.0996 PD 294 / TTM 31766 (Crescendo) - Planned
Development District 294 and Tentative Tract Map 31766 for the
subdivision of approximately 42-acre parcel into 79 lots. The
applicant is also requesting for the vacation of the westerly 23 feet
of the Vista Grande Avenue right-of-way. The Planned
Development District would allow new design and development
standards for a proposed development of up to 79 single-family
residential units located at 1000 west of Racquet Club Road, south
of Tram Way Road and west of Vista Grande Road, Zone R-1-A,
Section 3, APN: 504-040-046. (Project Planner: Edward O.
Robertson, Principal Planner) (Continued from September 12, 2007)
Edward Robertson, Principal Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007. Mr. Robertson provided an overview on the revisions made to the Boulders project.
Chair Marantz noted several corrections to the conditions of approval for the Boulders project pertaining to rock crushing. Staff responded the revisions would be noted.
The consensus of the Commission is to hear one item at a time.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
The following persons spoke in favor of the projects:
-John Wessman, applicant, Wessman Development, provided further details on the Boulders project pertaining to the streets, the gated entrance and the retaining wall. Mr. Wessman requested condition #12, on page 4, to include the wording, "except on new entrance on Via Escuela" and deletion of engineering condition #32, on page 12, regarding installation of sewer laterals extended to property lines.
-Bob Helbling, Palm Springs, spoke in favor of the projects; and noted Mr. Wessman has reduced the lots and the homes are in character to the surrounding neighborhood.
-Lyn Calerdine, LSA Associates, responded to further comments made to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
-Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, project engineer for Boulders, provided further information on the drainage, grading and emphasized that the zoning has been adopted for hillside lots.
-Paul Levitan, Palm Springs, noted that the revisions to the Boulders project fit in with the neighborhood.
-Emily Hemphill, representing the applicant and responding to testimony, addressed density, mass grading, the rock crusher for the Crescendo project, benefits to the city and the alluvial fan.
-John Wessman, applicant, provided further details on site plan for the Crescendo project.
The following persons spoke in opposition of the projects:
-Walter Baumhoff, Palm Springs, read an addendum to a report by Richard Simon, emphasizing that the project does not propose the highest and best use for the property.
-John Macon, Palm Springs, read the second part of Mr. Simon’s letter, pertaining to negative environmental impacts resulting from massive grading.
-Mallika Albert, Palm Springs, requested a continuance for the Commission to review the information submitted on the alluvial fan.
-Cheryl Beverly, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the mass grading.
-Dana Stewart, Palm Springs, voiced concern with mass grading, pollution and disturbance of wild-life.
-Roxanne Ploss, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the destabilization of the alluvial fan and suggested developers submit 3-D plans for better visuals.
-Rodney Drew, Palm Springs, requested adequate review and consideration of the proposed projects.
-John Goodrich, Palm Springs, noted the calculations and effects of rock crushing.
-Andy Linsky, Palm Springs, requested a thorough review and investigation for both projects.
-Solange Taylor, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the effects of rock crushing and suggested more time be taken for a thorough review.
-Charles Sachs, Palm Springs, stated concern with the instability of the land and the alluvial fan.
-Thomas Watson, Palm Springs, urged denial of the projects.
-Paul Levitan, Palm Springs, stated that the Crescendo project will negatively impact area.
-J.R. Roberts, Palm Springs, requested deletion of the on-site rock crushing and uniform grading or terracing of the projects.
Frank Gaydos, Palm Springs, requested more time to research wind and noise factors due to the rock crusher.
-Jeff Welshams, Palm Springs, provided information on the disturbance to alluvial fans and its massive effects.
-Victoria Hurst, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the disruption to the environment.
-Gladys Krennick, Palm Springs, spoke of the beauty of the alluvial fan and its preservation.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
A recess was taken at 3:50 p.m.
The meeting resumed at 4:03 p.m.
Mr. Ewing reported three corrections to the Boulders resolution: (1) On page 5, delete conditions #21 and #23; condition #12 to add the wording at the end of the sentence, "except gates shall be allowed on Via Escuela"; and delete condition #27.
Commissioner Hutcheson requested staff address the height of the retaining wall. Staff responded the height of the retaining wall is about 20 feet high. Mr. Hutcheson concluded that the majority of mass grading will be done to this area. Staff agreed.
Vice Chair Hochanadel requested engineering staff address if it is common to have developers run a lateral sewer line. Staff responded it is not a common request, however staff recommends running the lines to the south side of Chino Canyon Road when the road is excavated. Mr. Fuller offered an expense reimbursement agreement, to the applicant, to cover his costs of the new sewer laterals.
Commissioner Hutheson requested an amendment to the motion to remove the 20 foot high retention wall and eliminate the mass grading. Commissioner Scott seconded the amendment. Mr. Fuller reported that removal of the wall could be done, however, each home would require a private lift station pump. The Commission further discussed the need of the retention wall. Commissioner Scott noted a benefit is that the the boulders will be used for fill and not removed from the site. Commissioner Scott withdrew his second to the amendment on the motion.
Motion to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0973, Tentative Tract Map 31095 (Boulders), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Engineering Condition #32 to include a reimbursement agreement. Moved by Ringlein, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0973, Tentative Tract Map 31095 (Boulders), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Engineering Condition #32 to include a reimbursement agreement. (Approved)
CRESCENDO PROJECT - Case 5.0996 PD 294 / TTM 31766
The Commission discussed the Crescendo project and requested clarification on several items in the staff report and resolution.
Commissioner Hutcheson stated he did not see a justification for a planned development for this project.
Commissioner Scott felt this is not the best solution for this project and does not support it.
Motion to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0996 PD 294, Tentative Tract Map 31766 (Crescendo), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #26 - Option 1: No second story units allowed along the perimeter of the project or adjacent to another story unit. Second story units shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the total number of lots (19 total).
Moved by Ringlein, seconded by Caffery.
Vote to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0996 PD 294, Tentative Tract Map 31766 (Crescendo), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #26 - Option 1: No second story units allowed along the perimeter of the project or adjacent to another story unit. Second story units shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the total number of lots (19 total).
(Approved)
7. Case 3.3102 MAJ - An application by Doug Jones to construct an
approximate 8,863 square foot, two-story industrial building on 14.25 acres
located at 3301 Micro Place, Zone W-M-1-P, Section 30, APN’s: 660-160-
004, 007, 013 and 021. (Project Planner: Christopher Brown, Contract
Planner)
Commissioner Ringlein left the Council Chamber at 4:39 p.m. for the remainder of the meeting.
Christopher Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Vice Chair Hochanadel requested staff address if there is an on-site retention on the property. Staff responded if the project is approved, a hydrology submittal will be required.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
-Ingrid Baddour, commercial real estate broker, spoke in favor of the project and requested approval.
-Allen Sanborn, architect and engineer on the project, provided further details on the fencing, landscaping and drainage.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion to To adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Case No. 3.3102 MAJ, subject to Conditions of Approval. Moved by Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Hochanadel.
Vote to To adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Case No. 3.3102 MAJ, subject to Conditions of Approval. (Approved)
8. Case 5.1150 CUP / 6.500 VAR - An application by T-Mobile USA Inc., for a
Conditional Use Permit to install a forty-five foot tall commercial
communication antenna designed as a monopalm with equipment cabinets
and a Variance to exceed the 15 foot antenna height maximum located at
4711 East Palm Canyon Drive, Zone W-CDN, Section 30, APN: 681-170-
056. (Project Planner: David A. Newell, Assistant Planner)
Scott Taschner, Planning Technician, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Commissioner Cohen requested staff address the availability of a new slim monopole. Staff noted this monopalm has been approved in the past and other products are available.
Commissioner Caffery stated his preference to inform cell tower applicants that other models are preferred instead of monopalms and noted this site would have been ideal for a co-locator.
Vice Chair Hochanadel pointed out the importance of using the same type of tree as the existing trees to blend-in and camoflouge the antenna.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
-Laura Bishop, representing the applicant, provided further information regarding the location of the monopalm, live palm trees, co-locators and requested consideration for condition #18 pertaining to a requirement for a fire extinguisher.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
Marcus Fuller noted this site is in a flood zone and all equipment must be elevated 3 feet above ground and requested this added as a condition of approval.
Motion to To recommend approval of Case 5.1150 CUP and Case 6.500 VAR to the City Council, subject to Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #14 to include, ". . . additional live palm trees may be required
as determined by the Director of Planning Services."
*Condition #18 to include, " . . . as determined necessary by the Chief
of Fire".
*The cell tower and equipment will be developed in accordance with
the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Moved by Scott, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To recommend approval of Case 5.1150 CUP and Case 6.500 VAR to the City Council, subject to Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #14 to include, ". . . additional live palm trees may be required
as determined by the Director of Planning Services."
*Condition #18 to include, " . . . as determined necessary by the Chief
of Fire".
*The cell tower and equipment will be developed in accordance with
the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. (Approved)
9. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM:
*Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments
Mr. Ewing reported the upcoming study session discussion would include a list of planned development districts and tract map projects which have been approved within the last 2 years.
10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS:
**Discussion of Planning Commission representation to the
Architectural Advisory Committee meetings.
Mr. Cohen noted a concern with the vacant building (previously Desmond’s) in the downtown area and suggested several ideas. Staff noted dialogue is on-going with the Community Development department regarding this issue.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further comments, the meeting adjourned at 5:12 p.m.
Sep 26, 2007 Planning Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 1:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
The agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Services counter by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, September 21, 2007.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted, as presented.
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit.)
Chair Marantz opened Public Comments:
-Arlene Battishill, Palm Springs, spoke in reference to Item 5 (Boulders) and 6 (Crescendo); voiced concern with insufficient soil analysis and requested further studies.
-Mario Berardi, applicant for Item 4, requested consideration to defer the utility undergrounding to covenant due to a financial burden.
There being no further comments, Public Comments was closed.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Chair Marantz requested staff address Item 2 pertaining to the site which is covered with overgrown shrubbery. Staff responded this concern will be forwarded to Code Enforcement.
Motion to To approve, Items 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D, as part of the Consent Calendar. Moved by Hutcheson, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To approve, Items 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D, as part of the Consent Calendar. (Approved)
2A. Case 3.2402 MAJ - A request by Kent Salveson for a one-year
time extension to construct an eight-unit apartment located at
199 Via Olivera, Zone R-2, Section 3, APN: 504-270-004.
(Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2B. Case TPM 31351 (Indian Oasis) - A request by Margaret Parks of
the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians for a one-year time
extension for a mixed-use development consisting of
retail/office/industrial space, a 700-room luxury resort hotel and an
18-hole golf course on 273 acres located at the southwest corner
of Crossley Road and Mesquite Avenue, Zone M-1-P, Section 20,
APNs: 680-180-043, 45 and 046. (Project Planner: Bryan
Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2C. Case 5.1051 CUP - A request by Jay Jarquin of Avalon Pain
Solutions Inc., for a one-year time extension to operate an
intermediate care facility for patients with chronic pain located at
855 North Indian Canyon Drive and 175 East El Alameda, Zone R-3,
Section 10, APNs: 505-285-011 and 012. (Project Planner: Bryan
Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
2D. Case 3.3110 SFR - An application by Rick Christie, owner, to
construct a 3,918 square foot single-family residence on a hillside
lot located at 1577 Rose Avenue, Zone R-1-C, Section 1, APN:
505-044-014. (Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant
Planner).
Approved, as part of the Consent Calendar.
MISCELLANEOUS:
3. Case 5.1038 AMND PD 310 (Tangerine) - A request by Via Escuela
Land Partners, LLC., for a use and standards amendment to
Planned Development District 310 to permit installation of a
controlled entry gate and turn-around located at 217 Via Escuela,
Zone PD 310 (C-1), Section 3, APN: 504-310-036. (Project
Planner: Chris Brown, Contract Planner)
Commissioner Hutcheson stated his abstention on Item 3 and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. He left the Council Chamber at 1:44 p.m. Vice Chair Hochanadel noted his abstention and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. He left the Council Chamber at 1:44 p.m.
Chris Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
-Skip Goodell, architect, stated the guest entrance has been widened to 18 feet and the landscaping has been enhanced. Mr. Goodell requested approval of the entry gate for the safety of the homeowners.
-Mark Dupont, applicant, provided further details and emphasized the widening of the entry gate.
-Charles Sachs, Palm Springs, voiced concern with a potential road hazard at the nearby intersection due to traffic slowing down at the entry gate.
Commissioner Caffery entered the Council Chamber at 1:54 p.m.
Scott Ventura, Fire Division Chief, provided further details and indicated that a fire engine would be 11 feet in the right-of-way with the proposed entry gate and recommended a 24-hour man-gated entrance or no gate entry.
Commissioner Scott noted he is opposed to this request based on engineering and fire safety concerns.
Motion to To deny the applicant’s request. Moved by Scott, seconded by Ringlein.
Vote to To deny the applicant’s request. (Approved)
Commissioner Hutcheson and Vice Chair Hochanadel re-entered the Council Chamber at 2:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. Case 3.3033 and 3.3034 MAJ AMND - A request by Mario Berardi to change
previously approved Conditions of Approval to defer obligations to perform
utility undergrounding for a project comprised of two warehouse buildings
located at 245 and 265 Radio Road, Zone M-1, Section 34, APNs: 669-444-
002 and 003. (Project Planner: Bryan Fernandez, Assistant Planner).
Chair Marantz stated a business related conflict of interest and would not be participating in the discussion and vote. She left the Council Chamber at 2:01 p.m.
Christopher Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Marcus Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works, provided further details on the two previously approved buildings requiring undergrounding of utilities.
The Commission discussed the power poles on the adjacent properties and the estimate of the cost given by Edison of $160,000.00 for the cost to under ground the utilities.
Mario Berardi, applicant, provided further details and stated that the power pole to the west, on the adjacent property, should have been under grounded.
Motion to To approve, the applicant's request to defer utility undergrounding to covenant. Moved by Hutcheson, seconded by Caffery.
Vote to To approve, the applicant's request to defer utility undergrounding to covenant. (Approved)
Commissioner Ringlein requested utility undergrounding as a discussion item for a study session.
Chair Marantz re-entered the Council Chamber at 2:13 p.m.
5. Case 5.0973 PD 287 / TTM 31095 (Boulders) - Planned
Development District 287 and Tentative Tract Map 31095 for the
subdivision of approximately 30.4-acre parcel into 45 lots. The
Planned Development District would allow new design and
development standards for a proposed development of up to 45
single-family residential units located at 751 West Via Escuela,
Zone R-1-A, Section 3, APN’s: 504-150-002 and 009. (Project
Planner: Edward O. Robertson, Principal Planner) (continued from
September 12, 2007)
6. Case 5.0996 PD 294 / TTM 31766 (Crescendo) - Planned
Development District 294 and Tentative Tract Map 31766 for the
subdivision of approximately 42-acre parcel into 79 lots. The
applicant is also requesting for the vacation of the westerly 23 feet
of the Vista Grande Avenue right-of-way. The Planned
Development District would allow new design and development
standards for a proposed development of up to 79 single-family
residential units located at 1000 west of Racquet Club Road, south
of Tram Way Road and west of Vista Grande Road, Zone R-1-A,
Section 3, APN: 504-040-046. (Project Planner: Edward O.
Robertson, Principal Planner) (Continued from September 12, 2007)
Edward Robertson, Principal Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007. Mr. Robertson provided an overview on the revisions made to the Boulders project.
Chair Marantz noted several corrections to the conditions of approval for the Boulders project pertaining to rock crushing. Staff responded the revisions would be noted.
The consensus of the Commission is to hear one item at a time.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
The following persons spoke in favor of the projects:
-John Wessman, applicant, Wessman Development, provided further details on the Boulders project pertaining to the streets, the gated entrance and the retaining wall. Mr. Wessman requested condition #12, on page 4, to include the wording, "except on new entrance on Via Escuela" and deletion of engineering condition #32, on page 12, regarding installation of sewer laterals extended to property lines.
-Bob Helbling, Palm Springs, spoke in favor of the projects; and noted Mr. Wessman has reduced the lots and the homes are in character to the surrounding neighborhood.
-Lyn Calerdine, LSA Associates, responded to further comments made to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
-Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, project engineer for Boulders, provided further information on the drainage, grading and emphasized that the zoning has been adopted for hillside lots.
-Paul Levitan, Palm Springs, noted that the revisions to the Boulders project fit in with the neighborhood.
-Emily Hemphill, representing the applicant and responding to testimony, addressed density, mass grading, the rock crusher for the Crescendo project, benefits to the city and the alluvial fan.
-John Wessman, applicant, provided further details on site plan for the Crescendo project.
The following persons spoke in opposition of the projects:
-Walter Baumhoff, Palm Springs, read an addendum to a report by Richard Simon, emphasizing that the project does not propose the highest and best use for the property.
-John Macon, Palm Springs, read the second part of Mr. Simon’s letter, pertaining to negative environmental impacts resulting from massive grading.
-Mallika Albert, Palm Springs, requested a continuance for the Commission to review the information submitted on the alluvial fan.
-Cheryl Beverly, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the mass grading.
-Dana Stewart, Palm Springs, voiced concern with mass grading, pollution and disturbance of wild-life.
-Roxanne Ploss, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the destabilization of the alluvial fan and suggested developers submit 3-D plans for better visuals.
-Rodney Drew, Palm Springs, requested adequate review and consideration of the proposed projects.
-John Goodrich, Palm Springs, noted the calculations and effects of rock crushing.
-Andy Linsky, Palm Springs, requested a thorough review and investigation for both projects.
-Solange Taylor, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the effects of rock crushing and suggested more time be taken for a thorough review.
-Charles Sachs, Palm Springs, stated concern with the instability of the land and the alluvial fan.
-Thomas Watson, Palm Springs, urged denial of the projects.
-Paul Levitan, Palm Springs, stated that the Crescendo project will negatively impact area.
-J.R. Roberts, Palm Springs, requested deletion of the on-site rock crushing and uniform grading or terracing of the projects.
Frank Gaydos, Palm Springs, requested more time to research wind and noise factors due to the rock crusher.
-Jeff Welshams, Palm Springs, provided information on the disturbance to alluvial fans and its massive effects.
-Victoria Hurst, Palm Springs, voiced concern with the disruption to the environment.
-Gladys Krennick, Palm Springs, spoke of the beauty of the alluvial fan and its preservation.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
A recess was taken at 3:50 p.m.
The meeting resumed at 4:03 p.m.
Mr. Ewing reported three corrections to the Boulders resolution: (1) On page 5, delete conditions #21 and #23; condition #12 to add the wording at the end of the sentence, "except gates shall be allowed on Via Escuela"; and delete condition #27.
Commissioner Hutcheson requested staff address the height of the retaining wall. Staff responded the height of the retaining wall is about 20 feet high. Mr. Hutcheson concluded that the majority of mass grading will be done to this area. Staff agreed.
Vice Chair Hochanadel requested engineering staff address if it is common to have developers run a lateral sewer line. Staff responded it is not a common request, however staff recommends running the lines to the south side of Chino Canyon Road when the road is excavated. Mr. Fuller offered an expense reimbursement agreement, to the applicant, to cover his costs of the new sewer laterals.
Commissioner Hutheson requested an amendment to the motion to remove the 20 foot high retention wall and eliminate the mass grading. Commissioner Scott seconded the amendment. Mr. Fuller reported that removal of the wall could be done, however, each home would require a private lift station pump. The Commission further discussed the need of the retention wall. Commissioner Scott noted a benefit is that the the boulders will be used for fill and not removed from the site. Commissioner Scott withdrew his second to the amendment on the motion.
Motion to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0973, Tentative Tract Map 31095 (Boulders), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Engineering Condition #32 to include a reimbursement agreement. Moved by Ringlein, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0973, Tentative Tract Map 31095 (Boulders), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Engineering Condition #32 to include a reimbursement agreement. (Approved)
CRESCENDO PROJECT - Case 5.0996 PD 294 / TTM 31766
The Commission discussed the Crescendo project and requested clarification on several items in the staff report and resolution.
Commissioner Hutcheson stated he did not see a justification for a planned development for this project.
Commissioner Scott felt this is not the best solution for this project and does not support it.
Motion to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0996 PD 294, Tentative Tract Map 31766 (Crescendo), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #26 - Option 1: No second story units allowed along the perimeter of the project or adjacent to another story unit. Second story units shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the total number of lots (19 total).
Moved by Ringlein, seconded by Caffery.
Vote to To certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, and recommend approval of Case 5.0996 PD 294, Tentative Tract Map 31766 (Crescendo), to the City Council, subject to the Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #26 - Option 1: No second story units allowed along the perimeter of the project or adjacent to another story unit. Second story units shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the total number of lots (19 total).
(Approved)
7. Case 3.3102 MAJ - An application by Doug Jones to construct an
approximate 8,863 square foot, two-story industrial building on 14.25 acres
located at 3301 Micro Place, Zone W-M-1-P, Section 30, APN’s: 660-160-
004, 007, 013 and 021. (Project Planner: Christopher Brown, Contract
Planner)
Commissioner Ringlein left the Council Chamber at 4:39 p.m. for the remainder of the meeting.
Christopher Brown, Contract Planner, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Vice Chair Hochanadel requested staff address if there is an on-site retention on the property. Staff responded if the project is approved, a hydrology submittal will be required.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
-Ingrid Baddour, commercial real estate broker, spoke in favor of the project and requested approval.
-Allen Sanborn, architect and engineer on the project, provided further details on the fencing, landscaping and drainage.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
Motion to To adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Case No. 3.3102 MAJ, subject to Conditions of Approval. Moved by Scott, seconded by Vice Chair Hochanadel.
Vote to To adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Case No. 3.3102 MAJ, subject to Conditions of Approval. (Approved)
8. Case 5.1150 CUP / 6.500 VAR - An application by T-Mobile USA Inc., for a
Conditional Use Permit to install a forty-five foot tall commercial
communication antenna designed as a monopalm with equipment cabinets
and a Variance to exceed the 15 foot antenna height maximum located at
4711 East Palm Canyon Drive, Zone W-CDN, Section 30, APN: 681-170-
056. (Project Planner: David A. Newell, Assistant Planner)
Scott Taschner, Planning Technician, provided background information as outlined in the staff report dated September 26, 2007.
Commissioner Cohen requested staff address the availability of a new slim monopole. Staff noted this monopalm has been approved in the past and other products are available.
Commissioner Caffery stated his preference to inform cell tower applicants that other models are preferred instead of monopalms and noted this site would have been ideal for a co-locator.
Vice Chair Hochanadel pointed out the importance of using the same type of tree as the existing trees to blend-in and camoflouge the antenna.
Chair Marantz opened the Public Hearing:
-Laura Bishop, representing the applicant, provided further information regarding the location of the monopalm, live palm trees, co-locators and requested consideration for condition #18 pertaining to a requirement for a fire extinguisher.
There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed.
Marcus Fuller noted this site is in a flood zone and all equipment must be elevated 3 feet above ground and requested this added as a condition of approval.
Motion to To recommend approval of Case 5.1150 CUP and Case 6.500 VAR to the City Council, subject to Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #14 to include, ". . . additional live palm trees may be required
as determined by the Director of Planning Services."
*Condition #18 to include, " . . . as determined necessary by the Chief
of Fire".
*The cell tower and equipment will be developed in accordance with
the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Moved by Scott, seconded by Cohen.
Vote to To recommend approval of Case 5.1150 CUP and Case 6.500 VAR to the City Council, subject to Conditions of Approval, as amended:
*Condition #14 to include, ". . . additional live palm trees may be required
as determined by the Director of Planning Services."
*Condition #18 to include, " . . . as determined necessary by the Chief
of Fire".
*The cell tower and equipment will be developed in accordance with
the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. (Approved)
9. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM:
*Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments
Mr. Ewing reported the upcoming study session discussion would include a list of planned development districts and tract map projects which have been approved within the last 2 years.
10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS:
**Discussion of Planning Commission representation to the
Architectural Advisory Committee meetings.
Mr. Cohen noted a concern with the vacant building (previously Desmond’s) in the downtown area and suggested several ideas. Staff noted dialogue is on-going with the Community Development department regarding this issue.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further comments, the meeting adjourned at 5:12 p.m.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://palmspringsca.new.swagit.com/videos/14847/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item